2020
DOI: 10.1177/0361198120934480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic Flow Breakdown Prediction using Machine Learning Approaches

Abstract: Traffic flow breakdown is the abrupt shift from operation at free-flow conditions to congested conditions and is typically the result of complex interactions in traffic dynamics. Because of its stochastic nature, breakdown is commonly predicted only in a probabilistic manner. This paper focuses on using stationary aggregated traffic data to capture traffic dynamics, developing and testing machine learning (ML) approaches for traffic breakdown prediction and comparing them with the traditionally used probabilis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A series of performance measures were used to determine the predictive ability of a specified model. For each of the following quantities, a value close to 1 is preferable; values close to 1 indicate that the model is useful in predicting the probability of a minor conflict occurring (18,19). True positive rate (TPR) (i.e., sensitivity):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A series of performance measures were used to determine the predictive ability of a specified model. For each of the following quantities, a value close to 1 is preferable; values close to 1 indicate that the model is useful in predicting the probability of a minor conflict occurring (18,19). True positive rate (TPR) (i.e., sensitivity):…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models were developed for “queue within advanced detector” and “queue beyond advanced detector” scenarios. Filipovska and Mahmassani presented a methodology for online prediction of flow breakdown, using various ML approaches and stationary detector data ( 33 ). Alshayeb et al estimated stop-penalty k -factors by using an MGGP ML approach ( 34 ).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine learning could effectively solve the above problems. Through continuous iteration, the data center was dynamically identified, the traffic flow state was dynamically clustered, the catastrophe boundary was extracted, and the catastrophe interval was determined [25]. The specific process is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Catastrophe Boundary Extraction With Spectral Clustering Ana...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific process is shown in Figure 2. extracted, and the catastrophe interval was determined [25]. The specific process is shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: Catastrophe Boundary Extraction With Spectral Clustering Ana...mentioning
confidence: 99%