2016 3rd International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/icitacee.2016.7892463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Traffic sign detection based on HOG and PHOG using binary SVM and k-NN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also conduct comparative experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Since no other algorithms that we are aware of address crater detection on natural terrains, we compare our framework with state-of-the-art object-recognition methods, HOG +SVM [25] and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [38][39][40]. In order to elicit a fair comparison, the standard HOG+SVM approach and CNN extracted feature with SVM (CNN +SVM) approach are applied to the satellite image in the same sliding window manner as our first stage framework.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also conduct comparative experiments to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach. Since no other algorithms that we are aware of address crater detection on natural terrains, we compare our framework with state-of-the-art object-recognition methods, HOG +SVM [25] and Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) [38][39][40]. In order to elicit a fair comparison, the standard HOG+SVM approach and CNN extracted feature with SVM (CNN +SVM) approach are applied to the satellite image in the same sliding window manner as our first stage framework.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…particularly well-suited method, given that crater detection is a target-specific learning task with a relatively small number of samples available. Since bomb craters generally follow isotropic patterns, the framework considers both shapes and appearances features, including circular shapes [22][23][24], contours [25], morphological features [26], and gradients [27]. When building these custom features, this framework accommodates the variation of shapes and surrounding objects since some craters have eroded or have been planted in the fifty years following the bombing.…”
Section: Competing Interestsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traffic sign detection can be broadly divided into two categories [1][2][3][4][5][6]. One is the traditional method based on manual features [1][2][3][4][5], and the other is the deep learning algorithm based on CNN (Convolutional Neural Network) [6]. Traditional traffic signs are mainly detected based on the appearance characteristics of some traffic signs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reflects the matching degree between j-th target an i-th trajectory. If the Mahalanobis distance between the bounding box of the target in the current frame and the previous trajectory prediction observation is less than 9.4877, expressed as t (1) , the corresponding target and trajectory are related, expressed as b i,j = 1[d (1) (i, j) ≤ t (1) ]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [24], a supervised learning model called SVM-HOG is used for a car detection methodology in an outdoor environment. In [25], the authors compare k-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) and SVM; SVM-HOG is better than k-NN-HOG. With SVM-HOG, we can recognize symbol characters on the screen of the smartphones and ignore the effects of lightness and camera angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%