Tragfähigkeit von normalkraftbeanspruchten Wänden unter Berücksichtigung geringer Auflasten

Jäger, Wolfram

doi:10.1002/9783433605288.ch11

Cited by 4 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The parametric study in [7] is based on the bar model and includes the verifi cations at the top, bottom and the middle of the wall, where there the second order theory has been taken into account. It proceeds up to a characteristic wind load w k = 1 kN/m² and takes into account the real Folgende Ausmitten mit Berücksichtigung der Windwirkung wurden durch Anwendung der bekannten Algorithmen (s. [7,Tabelle 7] Here in apparent confl ict spaces, the term regarding to minimum surcharge load proved successfully with the arch model, as demonstrated in this paper.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the Model list of Technical Building Rules from March 2014 [6] and after DIN EN 1996-3/NA-A2 from January 2015 [5] for the application of DIN EN 1996-3 together with DIN EN 1996-3/NA the following should be considered: For walls that act as end support for fl oors or roofs and are stressed by wind, verifi cation of minimum surcharge load of the wall may be simplifi ed as follows, unless otherwise a more precise verifi cation has been performed: (1) [7]. Sie geht von den tatsächlichen Ausmitten infolge aufl iegender Decken aus und berücksichtigt die Anteile aus Theorie II.…”

Section: Verifi Cation Of Minimum Surcharge Load Due To Din En 1996-3mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Strictly speaking, it has to be considered in all walls, whether the requirement of Eq. The consequences have been demonstrated in page 461 in [7]. This means an hesitation for user and additional eff ort compared to the usual practice, and to amended by the NA of 2012 [4].…”

Section: Verifi Cation Of Minimum Surcharge Load Due To Din En 1996-3mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this respect, the simple considering of a normal force-moment interaction curve is not a useful verifi cation to lead to reality (see [7] Fig. However, the question of applying the appropriate model is rising, in assessing the structural behaviour of walls under normal force with low eccentricity.…”

Section: Verifi Cation Of Minimum Surcharge Load Due To Din En 1996-3mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For more details see [7] and [12]. The value N I represents the minimum; the second value N II represents the maximum value of the applied normal force.…”

Section: Normal Forces On the Top And Base Of The Wallmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Minimum surcharge load of URM walls under flexure and axial force / Mindestauflast bei Biegung mit Normalkraft

Jäger

Montazerolghaem

Hauschild³

2015

Mauerwerk

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper suggests a detailed parametric study, which has been drawn up in connection with the question of the necessity of verifi cation of masonry wall by a minimum vertical load subject to bending and normal force by the author and his team [7]. It assumes the actual eccentricities from supporting due fl oors and takes into account the second order theory in middle of wall according to DIN EN 1996-1-1 or the German NA. In some cases, the model is derived for very high wind loads to its limits. Using the arch model which is introduced in DIN EN 1996-1-1 and may be applied by NA, is helpful and effective. This method may provide higher capacity rather than for example, with the bar or plate model. In this article the verifi cation by means of the arch model will be presented and discussed. It is also shown that, forming an arch opposing to the horizontal wind load and low vertical loads may not come to a stability failure.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Verifi Cation Of Minimum Surcharge Load Due To Din En 1996-3mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Verifi Cation Of Minimum Surcharge Load Due To Din En 1996-3mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Verifi Cation Of Minimum Surcharge Load Due To Din En 1996-3mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For more details see [7] and [12]. The value N I represents the minimum; the second value N II represents the maximum value of the applied normal force.…”

Section: Normal Forces On the Top And Base Of The Wallmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations