36th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1998
DOI: 10.2514/6.1998-1066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trailing edge noise prediction using Large Eddy Simulation and acoustic analogy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For relatively simple geometries, various levels of approximations for Green's functions are possible. For example, the half-plane Green's function (Ffowcs Williams & Hall 1970) has often been used for computing trailing-edge noise (Manoha et al 2000, Wang & Moin 2000 on the basis that the airfoil is long and thin relative to the acoustic wavelengths of interest. However, its deficiency is highlighted in the case of a rectangular strut because the far-field solution depends on the placement of the half-plane relative to the strut (Manoha et al 2000).…”
Section: Effect Of Solid Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For relatively simple geometries, various levels of approximations for Green's functions are possible. For example, the half-plane Green's function (Ffowcs Williams & Hall 1970) has often been used for computing trailing-edge noise (Manoha et al 2000, Wang & Moin 2000 on the basis that the airfoil is long and thin relative to the acoustic wavelengths of interest. However, its deficiency is highlighted in the case of a rectangular strut because the far-field solution depends on the placement of the half-plane relative to the strut (Manoha et al 2000).…”
Section: Effect Of Solid Boundariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct numerical simulation ͑DNS͒, 6 unsteady Reynoldsaveraged Navier-Stokes simulations ͑RANS͒, 7 semideterministic modeling ͑SDM͒ 8,9 or, as detailed in this paper, large-eddy simulation ͑LES͒, 10,11 are currently used to compute the acoustic source ͑i.e., the unsteady flow field͒. All the methods described below offer many possibilities but also have some drawbacks: DNS yields a complete representation of the acoustic source term but does not offer the possibility to compute the high Reynolds number turbulent flow that must be dealt with in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In LES calculations only the filtered variables ũ i are known and the exact Lighthill tensor cannot be computed. Lighthill's tensor T i j LES ϭ ũ i ũ j calculated with the basic filtered variables is often used 10,11 and interactions between resolved scales and subgrid scales are not taken into account. Piomelli et al 16 proposed a correction based on LES properties to recover interactions described below and corrected Lighthill's tensor T i j LES by adding the subgrid scale tensor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the integral formulation, (2.9) reads as 102 However, if one uses a tailored Green's function, one can solve Lighthill's acoustic analogy directly for the given solid body distribution. [103][104][105][106] This approach is usually limited to simple configurations or numerical methods are used to compute Green's function.…”
Section: From Lighthill's Solution To Ffowcs-williams and Hawkings Anmentioning
confidence: 99%