2018 Joint Rail Conference 2018
DOI: 10.1115/jrc2018-6190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Train Energy and Dynamics Simulator (TEDS) Revenue Service Validation

Abstract: The Train Energy and Dynamics Simulator (TEDS) is state-of-the-art simulation software, developed by the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), to study train operation safety and performance as affected by a wide variety of rolling stock, track, train handling and operating configurations. As part of developing TEDS, existing and published data on braking, draft systems and train performance were used for initial validation of TEDS. This paper describes two revenue service tests conducted to fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TOES has been in use for nearly three decades, has been validated many times over and is considered an industry standard for longitudinal train dynamics modeling. A similar 1-D longitudinal dynamics model is the Train Energy and Dynamics Simulator (TEDS) model (Andersen et al, 2012;Sharma and Associates, 2015). TEDS is a more recently developed tool that calculates the in-line train forces and motions under specified track, traction and braking conditions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TOES has been in use for nearly three decades, has been validated many times over and is considered an industry standard for longitudinal train dynamics modeling. A similar 1-D longitudinal dynamics model is the Train Energy and Dynamics Simulator (TEDS) model (Andersen et al, 2012;Sharma and Associates, 2015). TEDS is a more recently developed tool that calculates the in-line train forces and motions under specified track, traction and braking conditions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%