2015
DOI: 10.1109/tcomm.2015.2455504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training-Based Antenna Selection for PER Minimization: A POMDP Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Optimization-driven methods employ suboptimal search algorithms to find the best subset. Padmanabhan et al [6] considered the problem of receive antenna selection using the known temporal correlation of the channel symbols embedded in the data packets; the model was stated as a problem of minimizing the average packet error rate and converted to a partially observable Markov decision process framework which was solved by heuristic searching schemes. Gulati and Dandekar [7] stated the antenna state selection problem as a multi-armed bandit problem, and used the criterion of optimizing the arbitrary link quality metrics to solve it.…”
Section: Relative Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Optimization-driven methods employ suboptimal search algorithms to find the best subset. Padmanabhan et al [6] considered the problem of receive antenna selection using the known temporal correlation of the channel symbols embedded in the data packets; the model was stated as a problem of minimizing the average packet error rate and converted to a partially observable Markov decision process framework which was solved by heuristic searching schemes. Gulati and Dandekar [7] stated the antenna state selection problem as a multi-armed bandit problem, and used the criterion of optimizing the arbitrary link quality metrics to solve it.…”
Section: Relative Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization-driven methods use the communication quality criteria, such as bit-error-rate (BER), channel capacity or bit error ratio, as the objective of antenna subset selection [610]. The optimization problems of antenna selection are always non-convex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Myopic policy is one of the examples of such solutions [14,15]. In [16], considering the positively correlated two-state Gilbert-Elliot channel model, the authors formulate the antenna selection problem at a multi-antenna receiver, with a single RF chain, as a POMDP problem with the goal of minimizing the packet error rate (PER). Defining the reward function as one unit of reward if the packet is correctly received, the authors show that under such a simple reward function model, the myopic policy is optimal for antenna selection problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defining the reward function as one unit of reward if the packet is correctly received, the authors show that under such a simple reward function model, the myopic policy is optimal for antenna selection problem. Considering an extension of the scenario considered in [16], the authors of [17] prove the optimality of the myopic policy for the case where the user is allowed to access more than one channel for data transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a considerable amount of work on AS with both conventional and M-MIMO systems, for example, in [4], it was found that not all antennas contribute equally in M-MIMO systems, and AS can reduce the complexity and cost of M-MIMO without large degradation in the performance; while the authors in [9] designed an AS scheme to reject the co-channel interference for a single user uplink scenario. Moreover, the authors in [10] and [11] aimed to enhance the error performance through AS by exploiting the temporal correlation, and the constructive interference, respectively. Although the proposed algorithm in [11] has low complexity, it works efficiently only for low modulation Phase Shift Keying (PSK) signalling, and it is data dependent, which means that extremely fast RF switching is required.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%