2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459x.2004.082402.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training Effects on Performance of Descriptive Panelists

Abstract: The amount of training necessary to adequately “train” a descriptive panel is a matter of contention. The objectives of this research were to compare the performance of descriptive panelists after short‐term (4 h), moderate (60 h) and extensive training (120 h). Seven screened panelists were chosen to evaluate three commercial tomato pasta sauces after each training period. Panelist performance improved with increased training. Sample differences were observed in all texture attributes and some flavor attribut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
6
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates and reinforces the need to use professionals such as Q-Graders and R-Graders, since these professionals are previously trained to perform such activities. This fact is also verified by Chambers et al [23], because, for the authors, the training time contributes to the level of accuracy of the evaluator, reinforcing the need for evaluators' training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…This indicates and reinforces the need to use professionals such as Q-Graders and R-Graders, since these professionals are previously trained to perform such activities. This fact is also verified by Chambers et al [23], because, for the authors, the training time contributes to the level of accuracy of the evaluator, reinforcing the need for evaluators' training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…Most sensory panel training programs aimed to perform descriptive analysis require up to 120 h of training [32]. However, training periods of 4 h, 60 h or 120 h employed for testing fresh tomato paste showed no significant differences, and even with the 4-h training period the panelists detected differences between products [33]. On this investigation, training people with previous experience on stone fruit species shows that the 5-h period has been sufficient for constituting a panel that was able to discriminate texture properties between different almond cultivars.…”
Section: Panel Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semi-trained assessors have been found to be appropriate for studying major characteristics of products (Chambers, Allison, & Chambers, 2004). The panel was trained in six sessions of one and a half hours each.…”
Section: Descriptive Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%