2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-017-0714-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Training Load Monitoring in Team Sports: A Novel Framework Separating Physiological and Biomechanical Load-Adaptation Pathways

Abstract: There have been considerable advances in monitoring training load in running-based team sports in recent years. Novel technologies nowadays offer ample opportunities to continuously monitor the activities of a player. These activities lead to internal biochemical stresses on the various physiological subsystems; however, they also cause internal mechanical stresses on the various musculoskeletal tissues. Based on the amount and periodization of these stresses, the subsystems and tissues adapt. Therefore, by mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

8
374
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 337 publications
(387 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
8
374
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, external physical load [28] can be perceived differently by each individual athlete (i.e., experienced internal load) [17]. For example, a biomechanical load with accelerations and decelerations when landing from a jump or sidestep cutting needs to be countered by a reverse optimal internal (joint) load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, external physical load [28] can be perceived differently by each individual athlete (i.e., experienced internal load) [17]. For example, a biomechanical load with accelerations and decelerations when landing from a jump or sidestep cutting needs to be countered by a reverse optimal internal (joint) load.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In connection to this, external and internal training loads use different pathways and therefore need to be measured complementary. The external training load (eTL) represents the activities performed by athletes, that is, the dose performed (Impellizzeri, Rampinini, & Marcora, 2005), while the internal training load (iTL) represents the psycho-physiological response by the athlete that primarily takes the form of biochemical stress (Venrenterghem, Nedergaard, Robinson, & Drust, 2017). In team sports, the training load is mainly derived from team practices, whereas external load parameters are collectively defined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to maintain an optimal connection between external and internal training load and to avoid players' maladaptations (i.e., over-or undertraining), coaches need to be constantly aware of their relationship (Venrenterghem, et al, 2017). In connection to this, two studies examining team sports, conducted on Spanish and Australian footballers (Gallo, Cormack, Gannett, Williams, & Lorenzen, 2015), showed a very strong correlation (r=0.74 and r=0.86, respectively) between external (PL) and internal (sRPE) pathways.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the ratio of acute training load (load of the last week) and chronic load (4‐week rolling average of load), called acute:chronic load ratio (ACWR), is reported to have an effect on the risk of injury . In team sports, assessment of internal training load (the psycho‐physiological response to this load) is also relevant as player's exposure to the load dosage (external load) may be consistent across players of the same team . Hence, to monitor and control training load, it is necessary to have a measure of both external and internal load …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%