Training Memory Self-efficacy in the Chronic Stage After Stroke

Aben, Laurien; Heijenbrok‐Kal, Majanka H.; Loon, Ellen M. P. van Coevorden‐van; Groet, Erny; Ponds, Rudolf; Busschbach, Jan J. V.; Ribbers, Gerard M.

doi:10.1177/1545968312455222

Cited by 41 publications

(21 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In contrast, specific aspects of memory (eg, visual-spatial recall, subjective memory experience, verbal and prospective memory, working memory, and attention) have been shown to improve after stroke in 6 different controlled trials that used very diverse cognitive training strategies. [430][431][432][433][434][435] A systematic review of the literature (1995-2011) focused specifically on information and communication technology tools for individuals with acquired brain injury, including stroke, 436 reviewed 5 studies that addressed memory problems. The quality of the studies was so low that it was not possible to determine whether the tools were beneficial.…”

Section: Nondrug Therapies For Cognitive Impairment Including Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Winstein¹,

Stein²,

Arena

et al. 2016

Stroke

2,179

840

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

e98Purpose-The aim of this guideline is to provide a synopsis of best clinical practices in the rehabilitative care of adults recovering from stroke. Methods-Writing group members were nominated by the committee chair on the basis of their previous work in relevant topic areas and were approved by the American Heart Association (AHA) Stroke Council's Scientific Statement Oversight Committee and the AHA's Manuscript Oversight Committee. The panel reviewed relevant articles on adults using computerized searches of the medical literature through 2014. The evidence is organized within the context of the AHA framework and is classified according to the joint AHA/American College of Cardiology and supplementary AHA methods of classifying the level of certainty and the class and level of evidence. The document underwent extensive AHA internal and external peer review, Stroke Council Leadership review, and Scientific Statements Oversight Committee review before consideration and approval by the AHA Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Results-Stroke rehabilitation requires a sustained and coordinated effort from a large team, including the patient and his or her goals, family and friends, other caregivers (eg, personal care attendants), physicians, nurses, physical and occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, recreation therapists, psychologists, nutritionists, social workers, and others. Communication and coordination among these team members are paramount in maximizing the effectiveness

show abstract

Section: Nondrug Therapies For Cognitive Impairment Including Memorymentioning

confidence: 99%

Guidelines for Adult Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Winstein¹,

Stein²,

Arena

et al. 2016

Stroke

2,179

840

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Though peers generally served comparable roles, each of the 4 studies using peers as administrators referred to them by slightly different titles: peer leaders, peer mentors, peer supporters, and social peer mentors. The 2 remaining studies used psychologists to conduct their peer support interventions and derived their peer support element from the interactions that occurred between group members [30, 31].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Peer support interventions for individuals with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, and spina bifida: a systematic review

Levy

Luong

Perrier

et al. 2019

BMC Health Serv Res

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Neurological disorders may negatively impact community integration and/or quality of life. Peer support has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance patients’ efficacy in managing their own health. This review examines the key characteristics and impact of peer support interventions for adults with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, and spina bifida on community integration and quality of life. Methods Eligible studies reported on peer support interventions for adults (16 years of age or older) with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, or spina bifida. Only randomized controlled trials published in English in the last 10 years were included. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL were used to conduct the literature search. Two reviewers independently screened studies, abstracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias (for individual study elements and overall) using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Results The systematic review included 6 trials reporting on acquired brain injury only. Of these studies, 4 reported on stroke and 2 reported on traumatic brain injury. Two studies found significant improvements in quality of life following peer support. No studies reported significant results on community integration. Considerable heterogeneity existed in the key characteristics of interventions. Conclusions There are a limited number of studies on the impact of peer support interventions for adults with acquired brain injury, cerebral palsy, or spina bifida on community integration and quality of life. Standardization of key intervention characteristics may aid the global adoption of peer support as a formalized, evidence-based practice. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4110-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

“…Stroke is a leading cause of mortality in industrialized countries ( 78 ), as well as the leading cause of long-term disability in adults. The prevalence of post-stroke cognitive dysfunction ranges from 23 to 55% within 3 months of the stroke onset, and decreases between 11 and 31% after 1 year ( 79 – 81 ). The main post-stroke cognitive deficits involve attention and concentration ( 82 ), memory ( 83 ), spatial awareness ( 84 ), perception ( 85 ), praxis ( 86 ), and executive functioning ( 87 ), with a significant reduction in autonomy of daily life and quality of life.…”

Section: Tele-cognitive-rehabilitationmentioning

confidence: 99%