Trait and phylogenetic diversity provide insights into community assembly of reef‐associated shrimps (Palaemonidae) at different spatial scales across the Chagos Archipelago

Abstract

Coral reefs are the most biodiverse marine ecosystem and one of the most threatened by global climate change impacts. The vast majority of diversity on reefs is comprised of small invertebrates that live within the reef structure, termed the cryptofauna. This component of biodiversity is hugely understudied, and many species remain undescribed. This study represents a rare analysis of assembly processes structuring a distinct group of cryptofauna, the Palaemonidae, in the Chagos Archipelago, a reef ecosystem under minimal direct human impacts in the central Indian Ocean. The Palaemonidae are a diverse group of Caridae (infraorder of shrimps) that inhabit many different niches on coral reefs and are of particular interest because of their varied habitat associations. Phylogenetic and trait diversity and phylogenetic signal were used to infer likely drivers of community structure. The mechanisms driving palaemonid community assembly and maintenance in the Chagos Archipelago showed distinct spatial patterns. At local scales, among coral colonies and among reefs fringing individual atolls, significant trait, and phylogenetic clustering patterns suggest environmental filtering may be a dominant ecological process driving Palaemonidae community structure, although local competition through equalizing mechanisms may also play a role in shaping the local community structure. Importantly, we also tested the robustness of phylogenetic diversity to changes in evolutionary information as multi‐gene phylogenies are resource intensive and for large families, such as the Palaemonidae, are often incomplete. These tests demonstrated a very modest impact on phylogenetic community structure, with only one of the four genes (PEPCK gene) in the phylogeny affecting phylogenetic diversity patterns, which provides useful information for future studies on large families with incomplete phylogenies. These findings contribute to our limited knowledge of this component of biodiversity in a marine locality as close to undisturbed by humans as can be found. It also provides a rare evaluation of phylogenetic diversity methods.

No escape: The influence of substrate sodium on plant growth and tissue sodium responses

“…( 2016 ). This method estimates the minimum trait transitions at each node and compares this to a distribution sampled from a null model (Head et al., 2018 ; Paleo‐López et al., 2016 ). We used 1,000 randomizations to infer a significant result if the number of observed trait changes was significantly ( α = 0.05) less than the median of the null model distribution.…”

“…We used a subset of the rooted and dated ALLMB phylogeny from Smith and Brown (2018) for our phylogenetic signal analyses; this phylogeny consists of a backbone from Magallón et al (2015) and data from both GenBank and the Open Tree of Life (Smith & Brown, 2018; available from https://github.com/FePhy FoFum/ big_seed_plant_trees; Table S2). The phylogenetic tree of angiosperms was pruned using the 'drop.tip' function from the ape package (Paradis & Schliep, 2019;v.5.3) estimates the minimum trait transitions at each node and compares this to a distribution sampled from a null model (Head et al, 2018;Paleo-López et al, 2016). We used 1,000 randomizations to infer a significant result if the number of observed trait changes was significantly (α = 0.05) less than the median of the null model distribution.…”

Assembly rules of helminth parasite communities in grey mullets: combining components of diversity

“…Finally, we used the standardised β1 and β2 given by EqRao function and defined as follows: (observed βmean of randomly simulated βs)/standard deviation of randomly simulated βs. This standardisation enables us to infer if the parasite species, traits or the phylogenetic proxy are overdispersed (negative standardised β) or clustered (positive standardised β) (Head et al, 2018) within a level of a factor (β1) or between levels of a factor (β2).…”

Spatially Well Structured Mangroves Fish Communities of the Persian Gulf; a Functional Perspective

“…Functional diversity analyses are based on sets of traits in understudied organisms that have ecological impacts on the environment (Cornelissen et al, 2003;Hooper et al, 2005;Loreau & Hector, 2001) and ecological service of a region (Diaz 2007). Currently, function-based approaches have an increasing role in the study of different systems such as microbial communities (Bhattacharyya et al, 2023), fungi (Plett et al, 2023), plants (Wang et al, 2023), invertebrates (Head et al, 2018;Zhang et al, 2022), and vertebrates (Ausprey et al, 2022;Mao et al, 2021;Walsh et al, 2022;Whit eld et al, 2022). Integrating functional diversity with other concepts in biodiversity (for instance, phylogenetic diversity and species richness) can produce novel conclusions about the history and assemblage of understudied communities (Flynn et al, 2011;Lin et al, 2021;Tucker et al, 2018).…”