2012
DOI: 10.3109/02688697.2012.671973
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Trajectories for frontal external ventricular drain placement: virtual cannulation of adults with acute hydrocephalus

Abstract: Despite its widespread use, the IMC trajectory performed poorly; PTS and CMC trajectories are more reliable ways of targeting the FILV when placing an EVD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with a previous retrospective analysis of imaging in which superiority of the PTS and CMC/EAM trajectories over the IMC/EAM trajectory was also demonstrated. 11 Performance did not vary significantly according to the number of ventriculostomies performed previously by our participants, supporting the notion that the differences in performance observed were solely due to the trajectories used and not the expertise of the person performing the ventriculostomy. To elaborate, one would not expect experience or expertise to influence performance in ventriculostomy with a prefashioned bur hole and prespecified trajectory, although one would if the participant would be allowed to perform the ventriculostomy without prior instructions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding is consistent with a previous retrospective analysis of imaging in which superiority of the PTS and CMC/EAM trajectories over the IMC/EAM trajectory was also demonstrated. 11 Performance did not vary significantly according to the number of ventriculostomies performed previously by our participants, supporting the notion that the differences in performance observed were solely due to the trajectories used and not the expertise of the person performing the ventriculostomy. To elaborate, one would not expect experience or expertise to influence performance in ventriculostomy with a prefashioned bur hole and prespecified trajectory, although one would if the participant would be allowed to perform the ventriculostomy without prior instructions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…3,9 Previous studies assessing the relative merits of different trajectories for ventriculostomy have largely focused on the retrospective analysis of imaging data alone. 11,14 The advent of neuronavigation has facilitated the ability to observe ventriculostomy trajectory objectively in real time. To this end, the aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the relative performance of 3 recognized trajectories for frontal ventriculostomy in real time using metrics derived from imaging using the StealthStation S7 Surgical Navigation System (Medtronic).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the general complications of EVD implantation as hemorrhage and obstruction, the most common misplaced catheters are basal ganglion, thalamus, internal capsula, corpus callosum, and frontal lobe. [123456891011121314151617181920]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The procedure is done using the established landmarks to the frontal horn especially cannulating the ventricle with a trajectory that is perpendicular to the skull. [ 5 ] The feeding tube is advanced up to 5–6 cm from the dura and the tube is tunneled to about 5–7 cm away from the burr hole point to reduce the chances of infection. CSF is diverted through an infusion set into a sterile collection bag and allowed to drain without a vacuum attached.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%