“…Pre-mRNA splicing in nematodes includes both conventional cis-splicing as well as trans-splicing (for reviews, see Blumenthal & Steward, 1997;Nilsen, 1997)+ In the trans-splicing reaction, the 59 exon is donated from a separate transcript, the spliced leader RNA (SL RNA), which contains hallmarks of the small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) involved in standard splicing reactions (Bruzik et al+, 1988;Thomas et al+, 1988;Nilsen et al+, 1989)+ Required cofactors for trans-splicing include the U2, U5, and U4/U6 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles (snRNPs; Hannon et al+, 1991;Maroney et al+, 1996) as well as serine/arginine-rich splicing factors (SR proteins; Sanford & Bruzik, 1999b)+ Although extensive similarities between the required cofactors for cis-and trans-splicing have been documented, there is a clear difference in the necessity for U1 snRNP at the 59 splice site (Hannon et al+, 1991)+ Thus, the transsplicing reaction naturally occurring in nematodes has been deemed independent of the need for the 59 end of U1 that normally base pairs with the 59 splice site+ A large body of work has elucidated many of the cis-acting elements involved in pre-mRNA splicing in higher eukaryotes (for review, see Reed & Palandjian, 1997)+ These include the 39 splice site AG dinucleotide whose necessity is coupled to the length of the preceding polypyrimidine tract (Reed, 1989)+ Because trans-splicing substrates lack the potential for spliceosomal interactions across an intron, they have been suggested to be exquisitely AG-dependent at the 39 splice site (Wu et al+, 1999)+ Additionally, the effects of 39 exonic sequences on splicing of an upstream intron were documented over a decade ago (Somasekhar & Mertz, 1985;Reed & Maniatis, 1986)+ More recently, discrete elements termed exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs) have been identified that promote upstream splicing in both alternatively spliced (for review, see Wang & Manley, 1997) as well as constitutive premRNAs (Schaal & Maniatis, 1999a)+ Many of these ESEs have been shown to interact with SR proteins+ The two major domains of SR proteins, an N-terminal RNA recognition motif(s) (RRM) and a C-terminal region rich in RS dipeptides, allow for RNA binding and protein-protein interactions, respectively (for review, see Graveley, 2000)+ In addition to the predominantly purinerich ESEs, several examples of other general classes of splicing enhancers have been identified+ These include the A/C-rich splicing enhancers (Coulter et al+, 1997), intronic splicing enhancers (for examples, see , and splicing enhancers that modulate 59 splice site usage (Humphrey et al+, 199...…”