2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36107-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Current Stimulation During Sleep Facilitates Insight into Temporal Rules, but does not Consolidate Memories of Individual Sequential Experiences

Abstract: Slow-wave sleep (SWS) is known to contribute to memory consolidation, likely through the reactivation of previously encoded waking experiences. Contemporary studies demonstrate that when auditory or olfactory stimulation is administered during memory encoding and then reapplied during SWS, memory consolidation can be enhanced, an effect that is believed to rely on targeted memory reactivation (TMR) induced by the sensory stimulation. Here, we show that transcranial current stimulations (tCS) during sleep can a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…). If instead the items were randomly chosen to cue replays and the activation always spread in one direction to the end of the sequence, the weights of the later links would grow stronger than the earlier links since they are more likely to be adapted over the course of many replays (Lerner et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…). If instead the items were randomly chosen to cue replays and the activation always spread in one direction to the end of the sequence, the weights of the later links would grow stronger than the earlier links since they are more likely to be adapted over the course of many replays (Lerner et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A potential strategy is to employ SW tACS to boost SWOs (Jones et al, 2018;Ketz et al, 2018) in alternating blocks with STAMPs. However, our recent attempt at this strategy failed to boost the consolidation of individual sequential experiences (Lerner et al, 2019). Potential reasons for the failure include a much smaller sample size for a between-subjects design (N = 12), the usage of a hybrid task with both procedural and declarative memory elements, the presence of a hidden temporal regularity shared across all sequence types, and mutual interference between specific STAMPs and non-specific SW tACS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…W, Wake. The asterisks indicate significant differences: *, p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. between learning and stimulation (Lu et al, 2018;Miyamoto et al, 2016), subjects' cognitive ability (Koo et al, 2018), different processing demands of the learning material, and/ or differences in NREM sleep stage composition at the time of stimulation (Dehnavi et al, 2019;Jiang et al, 2019;Lerner et al, 2019; Figure 2). For example, when, after learning a list of word pairs, subjects are instructed to forget correspondingly cued words (motivated forgetting), the relation of post-task spindle density during light versus deep NREM sleep differed as compared to a control condition (Figure 2).…”
Section: Memory Consolidationrecent Neuromodulatory Approaches and Rementioning
confidence: 99%