2017
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcranial Electrical Stimulation and Behavioral Change: The Intermediary Influence of the Brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Future rTMS research should focus on the inter-individual variability of effects [35], and promote the establishment of personalized rTMS treatment: tailoring rTMS to individualized targets and predictors based on structural or functional connectivity [36,37 ▪ ]; and adjusting rTMS protocols to distinct brain states guided by individual neurophysiological markers or using closed-loop protocols [38 ▪ ,39]. Furthermore, cognitive indices could be leveraged for several purposes: baseline cognitive performance can predict response to rTMS [40] and therefore – based on machine learning approaches – could be used as a relatively straightforward method for prediction; cognitive changes can provide insights on rTMS mechanisms of action, for instance, by exploring whether they mediate depression improvement [41].…”
Section: Personalized and Stratified Treatment As An Avenue To Precismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future rTMS research should focus on the inter-individual variability of effects [35], and promote the establishment of personalized rTMS treatment: tailoring rTMS to individualized targets and predictors based on structural or functional connectivity [36,37 ▪ ]; and adjusting rTMS protocols to distinct brain states guided by individual neurophysiological markers or using closed-loop protocols [38 ▪ ,39]. Furthermore, cognitive indices could be leveraged for several purposes: baseline cognitive performance can predict response to rTMS [40] and therefore – based on machine learning approaches – could be used as a relatively straightforward method for prediction; cognitive changes can provide insights on rTMS mechanisms of action, for instance, by exploring whether they mediate depression improvement [41].…”
Section: Personalized and Stratified Treatment As An Avenue To Precismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there have been increasing concerns about reported variability in response patterns across individuals. Although there is abundant evidence of physiological factors influencing interindividual variability (Harty, Sella, & Cohen Kadosh, 2017; Li, Uehara, & Hanakawa, 2015), remarkably little work has been explicitly directed at identifying baseline markers that could identify individuals who are more likely to be sensitive to NIBS. Recent investigations have highlighted how off-line electroencephalography (EEG) recordings acquired prior to NIBS interventions could be particularly viable in this regard (see Thut et al, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…179 Moreover, evaluating cognitive changes can provide mechanistic insights into the antidepressant mechanisms of action of NIN -e.g., by exploring whether they moderate and/or mediate depression improvement -and into NIN-induced changes in specific brain structures. 180 In this case, cognitive changes have been operationalized as fundamental mechanisms of action, but also as more translational processes, such as self-referential thoughts and emotions (e.g., negative affect, rumination, regret, cognitive bias). To date, most of this research is being performed in healthy volunteers, but the transition to clinical samples -also based on the idea of functional targeting of similar functional and neuroanatomical circuits using multimodal interventions -is slowly moving forward.…”
Section: Convulsive Modalitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%