2016
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m115.701268
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcription Elongation Factor NusA Is a General Antagonist of Rho-dependent Termination in Escherichia coli

Abstract: NusA is an essential protein that binds to RNA polymerase and also to the nascent RNA and influences transcription by inducing pausing and facilitating the process of transcription termination/antitermination. Its participation in Rho-dependent transcription termination has been perceived, but the molecular nature of this involvement is not known. We hypothesized that, because both Rho and NusA are RNA-binding proteins and have the potential to target the same RNA, the latter is likely to influence the global … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Bacillus subtilis, 25% of all termination events are ascribed to NusA, especially at sub-optimal intrinsic terminators 29 . Not only does this protein affect intrinsic termination: E. coli NusA may also globally antagonize Rho function 30 .…”
Section: E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Bacillus subtilis, 25% of all termination events are ascribed to NusA, especially at sub-optimal intrinsic terminators 29 . Not only does this protein affect intrinsic termination: E. coli NusA may also globally antagonize Rho function 30 .…”
Section: E Colimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…λN remodels the β flap domain, which forms one wall of the RNA exit channel, and the RNA-binding domains of NusA to redirect the nascent RNA away from the RNA exit tunnel where formation of a terminator hairpin, stabilized by NusA in the absence of λN (89), would trigger inactivating changes in RNAP (43, 44). These interactions explain how intrinsic termination is disfavored (90) and why Rho may fail to dissociate λN-TAC (91, 92): Rho has to track along the nascent RNA to trigger termination and could thus be sterically blocked from accessing RNAP by NusA domains. The λN-TAC structure also reveals that NusE interacts with L1 and L2 loops of the NusG-CTD, i.e., the same region that binds to Rho (32), thereby preventing NusG activation of Rho through direct exclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, while the evidence for S4 contribution to antitermination is solid, it is unclear whether S4 is principally responsible for the potent antitermination activity of the rrn -TAC. Secondary RNA structures, stabilized by NusA (or S4), could hinder Rho access (91, 96), but Rho is able to terminate synthesis of highly structured tRNAs (99). Antipausing properties of NusG unmasked by NusE contacts to the NusG-CTD (28) are unlikely to explain Rho inhibition because a much more potent antipausing activity of RfaH (15) is largely dispensable for its anti-Rho effects (12), which are instead due to RfaH activation of translation (27).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another mode of action of NusA could be that the NusA binding region on RNA may overlap with that of the Rho binding region. A recent study described that NusA mutants in SKK domain with enhanced RNA binding affinity were able to inhibit Rho dependent termination at the λt R1 (having an overlapping nut site) more efficiently by competing with the Rho loading step (Qayyum et al, 2016). It is expected that there exist overlapping NusA and Rho binding sites on many different mRNAs.…”
Section: Nusamentioning
confidence: 99%