The main sigma factor activating gene expression, necessary in stationary phase and under stress conditions, is S . In contrast to other minor sigma factors, RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing S (E S ) recognizes a number of promoters which are also recognized by that containing 70 (E 70 ). We have previously shown that transposon Tn4652 can activate silent genes in starving Pseudomonas putida cells by creating fusion promoters during transposition. The sequence of the fusion promoters is similar to the 70 -specific promoter consensus. The ؊10 hexameric sequence and the sequence downstream from the ؊10 element differ among these promoters. We found that transcription from the fusion promoters is stationary phase specific. Based on in vivo experiments carried out with wild-type and rpoS-deficient mutant P. putida, the effect of S on transcription from the fusion promoters was established only in some of these promoters. The importance of the sequence of the ؊10 hexamer has been pointed out in several published papers, but there is no information about whether the sequences downstream from the ؊10 element can affect In their natural environment, most bacteria are challenged by widely changing nutrient availability and by exposure to various forms of physical stress (temperature shock, oxidative stress, etc.). When starvation or various other stress factors cause a reduction or cessation of growth, many genes are shut down while others are induced to help the cells to survive. One way to modulate gene expression is replacement of the main sigma factor with an alternative sigma factor that recognizes a specific promoter of the stimulus response gene (reviewed in reference 19). In Escherichia coli, S regulates the expression of more than 100 genes involved in cell survival in the stationary phase and in response to different stresses (reviewed in references 14 and 15). The rpoS gene encoding S has been described also for nonenteric bacteria, e.g., fluorescent pseudomonads (21,36,37,40). Despite clearly different physiological roles, S is similar to the major sigma factor 70 in terms of structure and molecular function (7,26,42). No clear differences between 70 -and S -dependent promoters are apparent. A compilation of S -dependent promoters deduced a Ϫ10 consensus sequence, CTATACT, that is slightly different from the typical TATAAT sequence recognized by 70 (11). However, the binding patterns of E S and E 70 revealed by DNase I protection experiments are not completely identical (29,41). E S appears to be less dependent on contacts in the Ϫ35 region (7,17,41). The activity of E S and E 70 is differentially influenced by salt concentrations and by the degree of negative supercoiling of the DNA template (2, 10, 23). Additionally, a number of global regulators and histone-like proteins, such as H-NS, Lrp, CRP, IHF, and Fis, are involved in determination of sigma factor specificity (29; see also references 14 and 15 for a review and references cited therein).We have previously shown the generation of constitutively ex...