2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.09.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcriptional Reprogramming during Effector-to-Memory Transition Renders CD4+ T Cells Permissive for Latent HIV-1 Infection

Abstract: SUMMARY The latent reservoir for HIV-1 in resting memory CD4+ T cells is the major barrier to curing HIV-1 infection. Studies of HIV-1 latency have focused on regulation of viral gene expression in cells in which latent infection is established. However, it remains unclear how infection initially becomes latent. Here we described a unique set of properties of CD4+ T cells undergoing effector-to-memory transition including temporary upregulation of CCR5 expression and rapid downregulation of cellular gene trans… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

13
152
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
13
152
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest a role for T cell subset identity and intracellular environment in regulating the outcome of infection. Consistent with this notion, it has recently been demonstrated that HIV preferentially enters latency if infection occurs during a period of global cellular transcriptional downregulation as cells return to rest from activation (Shan et al, 2017). It is unlikely that the preferential silencing we observe in Tn and Tcm in our primary cell model is related to differential mutagenesis of the provirus, since almost 90% of sorted latent (GFP-) primary cells in our model re-expressed GFP upon TCR stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These results suggest a role for T cell subset identity and intracellular environment in regulating the outcome of infection. Consistent with this notion, it has recently been demonstrated that HIV preferentially enters latency if infection occurs during a period of global cellular transcriptional downregulation as cells return to rest from activation (Shan et al, 2017). It is unlikely that the preferential silencing we observe in Tn and Tcm in our primary cell model is related to differential mutagenesis of the provirus, since almost 90% of sorted latent (GFP-) primary cells in our model re-expressed GFP upon TCR stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These results thus suggest a role for T cell subset identity and intracellular environment in regulating the outcome of infection. Consistent with this notion, it has recently been demonstrated that HIV preferentially enters latency if infection occurs during a period of global cellular transcriptional downregulation as cells return to rest from activation (Shan et al, 2017). It is unlikely that the preferential downregulation we observe in Tn and Tcm in our primary cell model is related to differential mutagenesis of the provirus, because almost 90% of sorted latent (GFP − ) primary cells in our model re-expressed GFP upon TCR stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…However, infection of activated CD4 + T cells that are reverting to a resting memory state , or effector-to-memory transitioning (EMT) cells, provides the best conditions for the establishment of latency due to high CCR5 expression, adequate dNTP pools for reverse transcription, and reduced viral gene expression due to the sequestration of activation-dependent host transcription factors (i.e. NFκB and NFAT) (Shan et al 2017). For cells in this state, steps in the viral life cycle from entry to integration can proceed, but gene expression from the integrated provirus is minimal and transient (Figure 2).…”
Section: Latency Induction and Seeding Of The Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even in the uninfected state, very few activated CD4 + T cells progress to a memory state, with most cells dying during the contraction phase of the immune response. With HIV-1 infection, even fewer activated CD4 + T cells may escape viral cytopathic effects and host immune targeting to revert to a memory phenotype, and only rare infection of EMT cells provides the synergistic conditions that allow for the establishment of latency (Shan et al 2017). As determined by the limiting dilution quantitative virus outgrowth assay (Q-VOA), the frequency of latently infected cells in HIV + individuals is .03–3 infectious units per million (IUPM) resting CD4 + T cells (Siliciano et al 2003).…”
Section: Latency Induction and Seeding Of The Reservoirmentioning
confidence: 99%