2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transcutaneous cervical vagal nerve stimulation reduces sympathetic responses to stress in posttraumatic stress disorder: A double-blind, randomized, sham controlled trial

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, stimulation of viscerosensory pathways, directly via invasive and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or indirectly via cardiorespiratory exercises such as heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback, has been found to reduce mood and anxiety symptoms and attendant autonomic and neuroendocrine dysfunctions [29][30][31][32][33][34] . Hence, functional alterations in thalamocortical interoceptive pathways may be one systems-level mechanism by which taVNS may reduce symptom burdens in multiple disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In turn, stimulation of viscerosensory pathways, directly via invasive and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) or indirectly via cardiorespiratory exercises such as heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback, has been found to reduce mood and anxiety symptoms and attendant autonomic and neuroendocrine dysfunctions [29][30][31][32][33][34] . Hence, functional alterations in thalamocortical interoceptive pathways may be one systems-level mechanism by which taVNS may reduce symptom burdens in multiple disorders.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We showed that tcVNS blocks IL-6 and IFNγ response to traumatic script stress in PTSD ( Bremner et al, 2020a ) and blocks the rise in Pituitary Adenylate Cyclase Activating Peptide (PACAP) over three days of stressful tasks in traumatized subjects with and without PTSD ( Gurel et al, 2020c ). We also previously reported that tcVNS in traumatized healthy human subjects with and without PTSD blocked peripheral sympathetic and enhanced parasympathetic responses both at baseline and in response to both personalized traumatic scripts and mental stressors ( Gazi et al, 2020 ; Gurel et al, 2020a ; Gurel et al, 2020b ; Gurel et al, 2018 ; Gurel et al, 2020d ; Gurel et al, 2020e ) and modulated brain response to traumatic scripts ( Wittbrodt et al, 2020 ), and other studies reported that tcVNS blocked sympathetic function in healthy subjects ( Brock et al, 2017 ; Lerman et al, 2019 ) while taVNS blocked sympathetic function in healthy human subjects ( Badran et al, 2018b ; Bretherton et al, 2019 ; Clancy et al, 2014 ) and patients with co-morbid mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI) and PTSD ( Lamb et al, 2017 ). This work replicated findings in healthy subjects using implanted VNS ( Schomer et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…These studies have used a range of electrical stimulation settings and sites, and there is no optimal dose or set of parameters (Badran et al, 2018 ); the mechanism of VNS and responses are not well understood. While there have been studies that report mixed or no reported significant effects of VNS on HRV, pupil diameter, and evoked potentials, the preliminary effects on clinical populations are clear (Burger et al, 2020 ; Gurel et al, 2020b ; Libbus et al, 2017 ). The taVNS protocol used in this study (pulse width of 300 μs at a continuous rate of 30 Hz for 5 min) did not produce any significant effects (Debnath et al, n.d. ), but short-term taVNS (3.4 s ON, 26–27 s OFF) elicited robust pupil dilation and alpha oscillations compared to sham stimulation, showing that significant pupillary and EEG markers can be observed (Sharon et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%