2016
DOI: 10.3201/eid2202.151203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transdermal Diagnosis of Malaria Using Vapor Nanobubbles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, complete suppression of background from pigmented skin through time-resolved detection of PA signals from deep vessels ( Fig. 6(a)) provided an additional sensitivity improvement in parasitemia detection at the level of 0.00000001% that is approximately 10 4 -fold better than in the existing malaria detection methods [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The circulation of whole blood volume (~2 ml) in large ~1 mm mouse blood vessels takes just around 40-60 seconds (Table 1) that allows quick detection of just one iRBC among billions of nRBCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, complete suppression of background from pigmented skin through time-resolved detection of PA signals from deep vessels ( Fig. 6(a)) provided an additional sensitivity improvement in parasitemia detection at the level of 0.00000001% that is approximately 10 4 -fold better than in the existing malaria detection methods [12][13][14][15][16][17]. The circulation of whole blood volume (~2 ml) in large ~1 mm mouse blood vessels takes just around 40-60 seconds (Table 1) that allows quick detection of just one iRBC among billions of nRBCs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of global efforts, around 0.6 million people die each year from malaria [10][11][12]. The sensitivity of existing detection methods is not adequate for early malaria diagnosis before disease symptoms manifest and when treatment is more effective (see [12][13][14][15][16][17] and references there). Multiple theoretical and experimental studies (e.g., see the references in [18]) revealed that malaria pigment hemozoin more strongly absorbs light in the infected red blood cells (iRBCs) compared to normal RBCs (nRBCs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 To date, the results of this approach have only been reported in a single patient and questions have been raised about the study method, in terms of the reliability of the diagnosis and the rationale for failing to determine parasitemia at the time of the device test rather than hours before and after. 36 …”
Section: Five-year Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts to develop portable, magneto-optical, point-of-care diagnostic technologies that detect haemozoin have been made but no commercial product has yet emerged. Earlier efforts to use haemozoin as a biomarker for malaria were largely unsuccessful [ 21 , 22 ]. In addition, the parasite stage targeted influenced the results, such as immature forms that were established to have little or no detectable haemozoin [ 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%