Transdisciplinary Approach of the Mechatronics in the Knowledge Based Society

Entropic and Negentropic Transitional Model: A SemioPhysical Context

“…Considered as an interface between Sender and Receiver, the Synergistic Contextual Message (SCM) works in a transdisciplinary communicational pattern as an arrow, needle, and bullet; bridging the gaps and assuring the avoidance of the specific barriers, walls, and any other confusion in a superior ethic-semiotic valuation of the advanced knowledge products Lute, 2006;Nicolescu, 2008). (Pop & Maties, 2011; Synergy exists through the function of memory-messages that are conceptually integrated and that repeat essential units of meaning over time through different channels and from different sources that come together to create coherent knowledge and attitude structures in the receiver Zhu, 2002). Every message is identified through its informational content (transthematic identificatorswhat), the manner the messages are presented (code and channel -phenomenological descriptors-how), and the context the messages created are sent (logical abstractors-why) (Pop & Maties, 2011).…”

“…(Pop & Maties, 2011; Synergy exists through the function of memory-messages that are conceptually integrated and that repeat essential units of meaning over time through different channels and from different sources that come together to create coherent knowledge and attitude structures in the receiver Zhu, 2002). Every message is identified through its informational content (transthematic identificatorswhat), the manner the messages are presented (code and channel -phenomenological descriptors-how), and the context the messages created are sent (logical abstractors-why) (Pop & Maties, 2011).…”

“…2). The Kuramoto weak coupled oscillators model is introduced to explain the entropic and negentropic transitions in different semiophysical contexts (Pop, Talpoş & Prisac, 2015;Ho, 1994;Pop & Maties, 2011;Strogatz, 2001;Acebrón, 2005). As a consequence, by using the apokataphatic method it is possible to identify the most probable trend of a transitional process in a given context x, as a pattern of three main questions: what is, what isn't, and how does it work, as a transitional process in a synergistic context (space-wise, time-wise, and act-wise), (Mushakoji, 1988;Staune, 2006), with the included middle as transdisciplinary instrument for contextual choosing (Lupasco, 1987); lateral thinking (De Bono, 2003); and the bootstrap theory (Nicolescu, 2007).…”

“…The second situation, with Ix-Io→∞ (infinite), is identified with lack of knowledge, or evil knowledge, with the correspondent levels, No and Nx very different one from another, where No-Nx→∞, the communicational process working as an entropic degenerative process (Ho, 1994;Georgescu Roegen, 1971;Bernstein, 2009). Generally speaking, entropy defines the loss of the informergy (informaction incorporated in matergy) present in a closed source system, and negentropy is connected to the increase or maintenance of the informergy present in such systems Pop & Maties, 2011). A semiophysical system (Pop & Maties, 2011;Thom, 1990;Locke, 1975) has three pillars of the knowledge building: a) phenophysics (phenomenological physics, or common sense physics with structural functionalities) (Petitot, 1990;Arecchi, 2007); b) semiotics (with the logical-creative significance of a message in a given context) (Eco, 1997;Sebeok, 2001;Morris, 2003); and c) ethics (with the perspective of power through authority in leadership, learning, and relations, as moral, axiologic, deontologic, and even aesthetic aspects) Henry, 1996;Rae, 2009).…”

“…A semiophysical system (Pop & Maties, 2011;Thom, 1990;Locke, 1975) has three pillars of the knowledge building: a) phenophysics (phenomenological physics, or common sense physics with structural functionalities) (Petitot, 1990;Arecchi, 2007); b) semiotics (with the logical-creative significance of a message in a given context) (Eco, 1997;Sebeok, 2001;Morris, 2003); and c) ethics (with the perspective of power through authority in leadership, learning, and relations, as moral, axiologic, deontologic, and even aesthetic aspects) Henry, 1996;Rae, 2009). The seven fundamental questions considered as seven habits necessary to be put everywhere and at all times, to the "here and now; and/or; then and there", in order to achieve the integrated knowledge about the future trend of the knowledge-based society Pop, Talpoş & Prisac, 2015) are: (a) "where", through spatial participative sequence, space-wise-SPS, configured by the shape, dimensions, and proximity in which specific agents are to be found in a specific distribution and relationship; (b) "when", through temporal connective sequence, time-wise-TCS, marked by synchronic events in kairotic significance, and finally five questions (c) "who, with whom, what, how, and why", as a synergistic contextual message (SCM), through interactions which can be described in time and space through the actional-interactive sequence, act-wise-AIS (Pop & Maties, 2011;. The synergistic significance (synergy, 1+1>2, and significance, 1-1≠0), works as a transdisciplinary whole-transcending barriers, demolishing walls, and building bridges through the gaps, in order to optimize the synergistic communicational process, assuring the connection between the Sender as the transmitter and the Receiver as a recipient of the information while facilitating the transmission of significant information from an ethic and semiotic point of view as well.…”