2016
DOI: 10.1111/echo.13413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transesophageal echocardiographic diagnosis of a WATCHMAN left atrial appendage closure device thrombus 10 years following implantation

Abstract: Left atrial appendage closure with the WATCHMAN device is an alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation for thromboembolic prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation patients. Left atrial device-related thrombus (DRT) has been described in the first year after implant with an incidence of ~6%. A 79-year-old man underwent WATCHMAN device placement in 2006. Routine protocol specified follow-up transesophageal echocardiograms (TEE) at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year following implant showed no evidence for DRT or peri-dev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A particular challenging and unanswered question is the optimal length, frequency, and method of surveillance in these patients, especially considering that many of the reported devicerelated thrombosis have been reported beyond 6 months after the procedure. [38][39][40][41]…”
Section: Residual Leakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A particular challenging and unanswered question is the optimal length, frequency, and method of surveillance in these patients, especially considering that many of the reported devicerelated thrombosis have been reported beyond 6 months after the procedure. [38][39][40][41]…”
Section: Residual Leakmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 Up to now, there is only one randomized trial comparing LAA closure with OAC. 18,19 Progressive left atrial enlargement is a well-known phenomenon in permanent nAF and has also been documented after interventional LAA closure. Similarly, in the Munich consensus document on definitions, endpoints, and data collection requirements for clinical studies evaluating percutaneous LAA closure, new onset of heart failure after the procedure or measurements of natriuretic peptides are not included in the study design.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Peri-device leaks and thrombus formation on the device may occur as a complication of LAA closure even years after the procedure, and therapeutic options for these situations are still unclear. 18,19 Progressive left atrial enlargement is a well-known phenomenon in permanent nAF and has also been documented after interventional LAA closure. 20 This may result in the development of new peri-device leakage of an initially completely closed LAA during follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incomplete endothelialization could provide a persistent prothrombotic surface for thrombus formation.Delayed device surface healing could potentially be related to thrombus formation that accompanies any device implantation (13). Device related thrombus (DRT) formation may be related to degree of LAAO device endothelialization [14] .…”
Section: Casementioning
confidence: 99%