2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.03.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfemoral Aortic Valve Implantation

Abstract: Vascular complications in transfemoral TAVI are relatively frequent. VARC major vascular complications increase 30-day mortality and are predicted by experience, femoral calcification, and SFAR. Routine application of SFAR will improve patient selection for transfemoral TAVI and may improve outcome.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
118
2
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 488 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
10
118
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 With the advent of ongoing technical improvements including smaller accesssheath diameters, access-site and access-related vascular injury (ASARVI) have been reduced over time, but are still encountered in ≤17.3% in TAVI patients and are associated with an overall unfavorable outcome. 2,3 The majority of these complications affect the common femoral and external iliac artery, and, among others, include access-site bleeding mostly because of closure device failure, vessel dissection, or rupture. [4][5][6] With the lack of specific guidelines, acute management of vascular complications largely depends on the type of complication and the operator's experience and preference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 With the advent of ongoing technical improvements including smaller accesssheath diameters, access-site and access-related vascular injury (ASARVI) have been reduced over time, but are still encountered in ≤17.3% in TAVI patients and are associated with an overall unfavorable outcome. 2,3 The majority of these complications affect the common femoral and external iliac artery, and, among others, include access-site bleeding mostly because of closure device failure, vessel dissection, or rupture. [4][5][6] With the lack of specific guidelines, acute management of vascular complications largely depends on the type of complication and the operator's experience and preference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Оценивается степень кальци-ноза клапанного аппарата, состояние подклапанных структур, степень гипертрофии миокарда левого желудочка и межжелудочковой перегородки, фун-кция левого желудочка. Кроме этого, уточняются размер и проходимость подвздошно-бедренных сегментов артерий нижних конечностей для выбора адекватного доступа [40].…”
Section: Possibilities Of Interventionalunclassified
“…(32) MSCT is increasingly being used for the more demanding role of screening vascular access routes for TAVI. (33,34) The advantage is that an overview of all potential vascular access routes, including transfemoral, -subclavian or -apical may be obtained, (35) (Figure 4). In a combined scanning protocol the vascular overview can be obtained immediately following a scan of the heart without requiring additional contrast.…”
Section: Vascular Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%