2010
DOI: 10.1177/1471082x0801000102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer functions in dynamic generalized linear models

Abstract: In a time series analysis it is sometimes necessary to assume that the effect of a regressor does not have only immediate impact on the mean response, but that its effects somehow propagate to future times. We adopt, in this work, transfer functions to model such impacts, represented by structural blocks present in dynamic generalized linear models. All the inference is carried under the Bayesian paradigm. Two sources of difficulties emerge for the analytical derivation of posterior distributions: non-Gaussian… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[36] including covariates with constant coefficients for time accompanied by covariates modeled by transfer functions. Malhão et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36] including covariates with constant coefficients for time accompanied by covariates modeled by transfer functions. Malhão et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last 10 observations are excluded from the fit with the purpose of comparing the forecasts, and thus n = 386. Time series of sulfur dioxide SO 2 ( x 1 t ) and carbon monoxide CO ( x 2 t ), t = 1, … , n , also shown in Figure , were considered as covariates since exposure to these air pollutants can increase the risk of respiratory illnesses (Ferris et al ., ; Alves et al ., ). These series were chosen because, usually, high concentrations of CO, produced by vehicles, are found in urban areas and the fuels based on the sulfur (for instance, oils) in combustion produce SO 2 .…”
Section: Application To Real Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As discussed in Frühwirth‐Schnatter (1995) and Alves et al (2010), when analyzing time series data one should choose that model which performs best in terms of future predictions. The expression in can be used to evaluate posterior model probabilities of any collection of models (Frühwirth‐Schnatter, 1995).…”
Section: Proposed Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gelfand & Ghosh (1998) mention that ordering of models is typically insensitive to the choice of k, therefore we fix k = 100. Notice that at each iteration of the MCMC we can obtain replicates of the observations given the sampled values of the parameters and then compute D As discussed in Frühwirth-Schnatter (1995) and Alves et al (2010), when analyzing time series data one should choose that model which performs best in terms of future predictions. The expression in equation (8) can be used to evaluate posterior model probabilities of any collection of models (Frühwirth-Schnatter, 1995).…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%