2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2107.05399
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer Learning from Synthetic to Real LiDAR Point Cloud for Semantic Segmentation

Abstract: Synthetic point cloud captured in (a).(e) Synthetic-to-real translation of point cloud in (b). (c) Real point cloud of SemanticKITTI. (d) CarsFigure 1: We create a large-scale multiple-class synthetic LiDAR point cloud dataset SynLiDAR with point-wise annotations as illustrated in (b) by constructing multiple virtual environments and 3D object models as illustrated in (a). To mitigate the domain gap with real-world LiDAR point cloud in (c), we design a point cloud translation network (PCT-Net) that transfers t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following this direction, [27] combines Gaussian Process (GP) and Dirichlet Process (DP) to build a DP-GP model with an infinite number of clusters to discover traffic primitives, which can be combined to create new scenarios. [38] generates point cloud sequential datasets via minimizing the gap between real-world LiDAR and simulation data. Similarly, Meta-sim [39] and Meta-Sim2 [40] try to minimize the sim-toreal gap to reconstruct traffic scenarios for automatic labeling.…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following this direction, [27] combines Gaussian Process (GP) and Dirichlet Process (DP) to build a DP-GP model with an infinite number of clusters to discover traffic primitives, which can be combined to create new scenarios. [38] generates point cloud sequential datasets via minimizing the gap between real-world LiDAR and simulation data. Similarly, Meta-sim [39] and Meta-Sim2 [40] try to minimize the sim-toreal gap to reconstruct traffic scenarios for automatic labeling.…”
Section: Bayesian Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lots of works use Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) [33,61,20,34] or random walk [66] to propagate labels. Moreover, there are also works that utilize prototype learning [33,66], siamese learning [61,44], temporal constraints [36], smoothness constraints [44,47], attention [54,66], cross task consistency [44], and synthetic data [56] to help training.…”
Section: Label-efficient 3d Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With transfer learning, a common two-step approach to overcome the scarcity of data is to train a model on large volumes of synthetically generated data and, subsequently, adopt this model by using a small sample of real data [18]. Although this process has been widely applied in computer vision [19], there is limited research on its application to improve the robustness and accuracy of vehicle detection models for low-cost manufacturing LiDAR sensors. In the literature, there are several types of transfer learning, including homogenous, heterogenous, inductive, and transductive transfer learning [20,21], and there are different methods used for transfer learning, namely feature-based and model-based transfer learning [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%