2015 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2015.7257018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer learning in genetic programming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Chen et al [13] investigated the combination of GP with gradient descent for transfer learning in symbolic regression. Further, Dinh et al [15] proposed transfer learning in GP by using the learnt knowledge from the source domain to initialize the population of GP on the target domain in three different ways, which are copying the full trees, using the sub-trees, and copying the best trees in each generation. The results on symbolic regression problems showed that the subtree transferring strategy outperformed the other two.…”
Section: B Transfer Learning In Genetic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, Chen et al [13] investigated the combination of GP with gradient descent for transfer learning in symbolic regression. Further, Dinh et al [15] proposed transfer learning in GP by using the learnt knowledge from the source domain to initialize the population of GP on the target domain in three different ways, which are copying the full trees, using the sub-trees, and copying the best trees in each generation. The results on symbolic regression problems showed that the subtree transferring strategy outperformed the other two.…”
Section: B Transfer Learning In Genetic Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, "when to transfer" and "how to transfer" are two key parts in GP with transfer learning. However, regarding "when to transfer", most existing GP [15] with transfer learning methods focus on transferring knowledge only at the initialization of the GP learning/evolution process, which does not fully utilise the extracted useful knowledge. Regarding "how to transfer", existing methods [15] often transfer an evolved tree from the source domain to the target domain as a whole tree, which may not be promising, but the evolved tree might be very useful if it is used as subtree to form a new tree/solution for the target problem.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although both EAs and TL have received considerable attention in their own areas, few researchers in EAs studied the methods by introducing TL for difficult problem optimisation. For example, TL was introduced in Genetic Programming (GP) by taking some solutions (such as the best, middle and the worst) as the knowledge feature from the source optimisation problem to target optimisation problems by replacing some randomly generated solutions (Kocer and Arslan, 2010) or by transferring good individuals or subindividuals (sub-tree in GP) to the target problems (Dinh et al, 2015). However, both of these studies only focused on the issue in TL: 'what to transfer', but the other two issues 'how to transfer' and 'when to transfer' were not studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%