PsycEXTRA Dataset 1984
DOI: 10.1037/e457812004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfer of training: An interpretive review.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extending beyond the domain of organizational-training literature, recent research in the areas of information processing and instructional theory holds promise for furthering our understanding of training-design issues. Cormier (1984) contends that an information-processing perspective has implications for training design. He points out that the principle of identical elements can be reconceptualized by using what we know about encoding and retrieval processes.…”
Section: Training Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Extending beyond the domain of organizational-training literature, recent research in the areas of information processing and instructional theory holds promise for furthering our understanding of training-design issues. Cormier (1984) contends that an information-processing perspective has implications for training design. He points out that the principle of identical elements can be reconceptualized by using what we know about encoding and retrieval processes.…”
Section: Training Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, a training stimulus is conceptualized as a collection of attributes or elements (E. Smith, Shoben, & Rips, 1974;Underwood, 1969) that vary in terms of redintegrative capacity (Flexser & Tulving, 1978). Redintegration refers to the capacity of one part of a stimulus complex to re-evoke or cue the entire complex (Cormier, 1984). The redintegrative value of the available retrieval information is the critical determinant of its effectiveness.…”
Section: Training Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the most basic sense, the process of training transfer refers to the effect of the initial training task (task 1) on the achievement of a subsequent transfer task (task 2). There are three possible transfer outcomes: training in task one can (1) facilitate performance of task 2 (aka positive transfer), (2) retard performance on task 2 (aka negative transfer), or (3) have no effect on the acquisition of task 2 at all (Cormier 1984).…”
Section: Transfer Of Training Review Addendummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 1961, Shore and Sechrest found that using a number of examples repeated a few times was a more effective training approach than using one example repeated many times. Several other early investiga-tions (Shore & Sechrest, 1961;Underwood, 1969;Smith et al, 1974;Smith et al, 1974;Cormier, 1984) demonstrated that the highest levels of positive training transfer may not be based on fidelity, but rather the capacity of one part of the stimulus to cue the entire scenario. This means that the required fidelity can be subject to the level of training and that even low fidelity training can produce high quality training as long as there are strong and accurate cuing relationships between the scenario attributes.…”
Section: Transfer Of Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%