“…This discourse argues that, because therapy is conducted between two real people, the total variation in human experience is permissible and decipherable. In this regard, the cognitive countertransference literature has begun to investigate the effects of countertransference reactions/enactments (Cartwright & Read, ; Hayes, Gelso & Hummel, ; Prasko et al ., ; Vyskocilova et al ., ) but there remains a high level of tolerance for, and even justification of enactment behaviour, even if it departs markedly from the basic relational principles of cognitive‐behavioural therapy (Myers & Hayes, ; Yeh & Hayes, ). Such thinking parallels somewhat the mentioned post‐Freudian psychoanalytic arguments for greater use of the analyst's transference in psychoanalytic work (Carpy, ; Levenson, ; Renik, ; Varga; ); however, it is likely to produce more varied actions in therapy, given the comparatively unregulated cognitive‐behavioural method.…”