2008
DOI: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transfixion incision as an initial technique in nasal tip deprojection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, marginal incisions had been done for 70% of patients, inter-cartilagenous incisions had been done for 30%, trans-fixation incisions had been done for 20%, and trans-cartilagenous incisions had been done for 10% of patients. P. Solomon et al reported 72 patients (100%) with transfixion incision alone for assessment of the effect of transfixation incision on nasal tip deprojection, because a full transfixion incision disrupts the attachment of the medial crura to the caudal septum, which weakens nasal tip support, resulting in deprojection of the tip (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, marginal incisions had been done for 70% of patients, inter-cartilagenous incisions had been done for 30%, trans-fixation incisions had been done for 20%, and trans-cartilagenous incisions had been done for 10% of patients. P. Solomon et al reported 72 patients (100%) with transfixion incision alone for assessment of the effect of transfixation incision on nasal tip deprojection, because a full transfixion incision disrupts the attachment of the medial crura to the caudal septum, which weakens nasal tip support, resulting in deprojection of the tip (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,20] Since the connection between the septum and medial crura is completely cut-off in cases with transfusion incisions, the nasal tip support becomes weak resulting in de-projection of the tip. [21] In classical septoplasty, unilateral hemitransfixion incision is performed, whereas bilateral transfixion incision is often performed in combination with intercartilaginous or intracartilaginous incision in the closed septorhinoplasty technique. [11,22] Although transfixion incision has been considered general overall approach for many years in closed rhinoplasty cases, hemitransfixion incision has currently gained ground as the technique of choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…24 One study found that a full transfixion alone reduces projection by 1.4 to 2.1 mm, depending on skin thickness. 44 Similarly, violation of the scroll support with a cephalic trim and anterior septal angle reduction will further deproject the nose. 37,45 Petroff and associates caution against excessive operative deprojection, supported by their intraoperative and postoperative findings.…”
Section: Overprojected Nosementioning
confidence: 99%