1969
DOI: 10.1099/00221287-59-2-247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation of Micrococcus lysodeikticus by Various Members of the Family Micrococcaceae

Abstract: SUMMARYVarious strains originally designated as members of the genera Micrococcus, Sarcina, and Staphylococcus were able to transform adenine, histidine, and tryptophan auxotrophs of Micrococcus lysodeikticus to prototrophy at relatively high frequencies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1974 Keddie (17) pointed out that "Micrococcus species should be regarded as degenerate forms, locked into the coccoid stage of the Arthrobacter life cycle. These molecular data suggest that micrococci should be accommodated in one family with the genus Arthrobacter" (25) (20). Similar results were obtained in a comparative immunological study of catalase activity (41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1974 Keddie (17) pointed out that "Micrococcus species should be regarded as degenerate forms, locked into the coccoid stage of the Arthrobacter life cycle. These molecular data suggest that micrococci should be accommodated in one family with the genus Arthrobacter" (25) (20). Similar results were obtained in a comparative immunological study of catalase activity (41).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Therefore, the phylogenetic depth and width of these two genera and of the Arthrobacter line of descent within the subphylum of actinomycetes had not been fully explored. Early comparative chemotaxonomic analyses (9, 11-13, 34, 53), a genetic analysis (20), and determinations of levels of DNA-DNA similarity (35,44) also did not include all of the valid species known today. Although the previous phylogenetic studies included only micrococci, these studies led to the following taxonomic rearrangements: certain radiation-resistant red micrococci were transferred to the genus Deinococcus (2); Micrococcus muciluginosus was reclassified as Stomatococcus mucilaginosus (1); and Micrococcus agilis was found to be a phylogenetic member of the "Arthrobacrer globiformis-Arthrobacter citreus group" (sensu Keddie and Jones [19]), and as this species also had chemotaxonomic properties in common with its nonmicrococ-cal relatives, Koch and Stackebrandt proposed that it should be redescribed as Arthrobacter agilis (24).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Micrococcus luteus I A M I 0 9 7 was not considered to belong to group I because of its low GC content (66 7;); different peptidoglycan type (A4z) and menaquinone pattern (Jeffries et al, 1965); and other characteristics . (Kloos, 1969), which is in agreement with our results. Micrococcus varians ATCCIgO99 and ATCC I9 I 00, and M .…”
Section: O G a S A W A R A -F U J I T A A N D K S A K A G U C H Isupporting
confidence: 83%
“…A fragment of the primary structure of such a peptidoglycan is depicted in Fig. 1 the genera Micrococcus, Sarcina, and Staphylococcus were able to transform tryptophan, histidine, and adenine auxotrophs of M. luteus ATCC 27141 to prototrophy with an efficiency equal t o that of homologous crosses (6). Since nutritional markers are usually transformed only among very closely related organisms, it was suggested by Kloos (6) that all strains capable of transforming M. luteus ATCC 27141 are members of a single species, M .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%