2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.03.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformation products of 2-benzoxazolinone (BOA) in soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Gents et al (2005) were able to demonstrate that the degradation of BOA to APO was concentration-dependent with low soil concentrations (400 μg kg −1 ) yielding only one unidentified transformation product, while higher soil concentrations (400 mg kg −1 ) yielded eight distinct transformation products, one of which was confirmed as APO in accordance with Gagliardo and Chilton (1992). APO has been shown to be more biologically active than BOA (Gagliardo and Chilton, 1992) including higher phytotoxicity and increased toxicity towards beneficial soil organisms and fungi (Gents et al, 2005). Gents et al (2005) suggest that BOA is only toxic to microorganisms at higher concentrations and, therefore, microbes may convert BOA into APO and several other products thus ameliorating toxic conditions, thereby increasing phytotoxicity.…”
Section: Increases In Allelochemical Toxicity Through Microbialmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Gents et al (2005) were able to demonstrate that the degradation of BOA to APO was concentration-dependent with low soil concentrations (400 μg kg −1 ) yielding only one unidentified transformation product, while higher soil concentrations (400 mg kg −1 ) yielded eight distinct transformation products, one of which was confirmed as APO in accordance with Gagliardo and Chilton (1992). APO has been shown to be more biologically active than BOA (Gagliardo and Chilton, 1992) including higher phytotoxicity and increased toxicity towards beneficial soil organisms and fungi (Gents et al, 2005). Gents et al (2005) suggest that BOA is only toxic to microorganisms at higher concentrations and, therefore, microbes may convert BOA into APO and several other products thus ameliorating toxic conditions, thereby increasing phytotoxicity.…”
Section: Increases In Allelochemical Toxicity Through Microbialmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…MBOA and BOA have been shown to be further transformed into 2-amino-7-methoxy-3 H-phenoxazin-3-one (AMPO) and 2-amino-3 H-phenoxazin-3-one (APO), respectively (Understrup et al, 2005). Gents et al (2005) were able to demonstrate that the degradation of BOA to APO was concentration-dependent with low soil concentrations (400 μg kg −1 ) yielding only one unidentified transformation product, while higher soil concentrations (400 mg kg −1 ) yielded eight distinct transformation products, one of which was confirmed as APO in accordance with Gagliardo and Chilton (1992). APO has been shown to be more biologically active than BOA (Gagliardo and Chilton, 1992) including higher phytotoxicity and increased toxicity towards beneficial soil organisms and fungi (Gents et al, 2005).…”
Section: Increases In Allelochemical Toxicity Through Microbialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maybe the best estimate for naturally occurring APO concentrations can be gained from studies of exudation of the APO precursor DIBOA from roots: In hydroponic cultures, DIBOA released from rye (Secale cereale) and durum (Triticum durum) roots accumulated to concentrations of 300 and 30 µM, respectively (Belz and Hurle, 2005;Macías et al, 2014). Given the equimolar conversion of DIBOA to BOA, and a conversion rate of 10:1 of BOA into APO (Gents et al, 2005;Understrup et al, 2005), this would result in APO concentrations of 30 and 3 µM, respectively. These concentrations are in the range determined to be effective in our assays, which supports HDAC inhibition by APO as a realistic model for allelopathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydroxamic acids are bound as glucosides in plant vacuoles and released by -glucosidases upon disruption of cellular integrity (Yue et al, 1998). Further degradation products have Name of allelochemical Acronym Source Benzoxazolin-2-one BOA DIBOA 6-methoxybenzoxazolin-2-one MBOA DIMBOA 2,4-dihydroxy-1,4-(2H)-benzoxazin-3-one DIBOA 2,4-dihydroxy-7-methoxy-1,4-(2H)-benzoxazin-3-one DIMBOA 2-amino-3H-phenoxazin-3-one APO BOA 2-amino-7-methoxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one AMPO DIMBOA, MBOA 2-acetylamino-7-methoxyphenoxazin-3-one AAMPO MBOA N-(2-hydroxyphenyl) malonamic acid HPMA been identified as 2-amino-3H-phenoxazin-3-one (APO) and 2-amino-7-methoxy-3H-phenoxazin-3-one (AMPO) from BOA and MBOA, respectively (Kumar et al, 1993;Fomsgaard et al, 2004;Macías et al, 2004;Gents et al, 2005;Understrup et al, 2005). Formation of APO from BOA has been found to occur through the intermediate 2-aminophenol, both as a chemical process and as a microbial process (Gagliardo and Chilton, 1992).…”
Section: Chemical Formsmentioning
confidence: 99%