2017
DOI: 10.1080/15309576.2017.1335220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transformational Leadership and Mission Valence of Employees: The Varying Effects by Organizational Level

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of U.S. local government, Wright, Moynihan, and Pandey () find transformational leadership to be positively related to mission valence but only through public service motivation and goal clarity. Similarly, in the context of a U.S. state agency, Pasha et al () find indirect relationships between transformational leadership and mission valence through performance management and goal clarity. The lack of empirical evidence on a direct relationship between transformational leadership and mission valence, we argue, may be attributed to an overlooked role of leaders' communication of the vision.…”
Section: Transformational Leadership and Mission Valencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the context of U.S. local government, Wright, Moynihan, and Pandey () find transformational leadership to be positively related to mission valence but only through public service motivation and goal clarity. Similarly, in the context of a U.S. state agency, Pasha et al () find indirect relationships between transformational leadership and mission valence through performance management and goal clarity. The lack of empirical evidence on a direct relationship between transformational leadership and mission valence, we argue, may be attributed to an overlooked role of leaders' communication of the vision.…”
Section: Transformational Leadership and Mission Valencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, the use of agencies enables managers to use a more transactional, managerialist style, and to focus on cost reduction and performance systems (Pollitt, 2006), which might increase the administrative burden for individual employees. Employees might, therefore, fail to notice the organization's (societal) impact (Pasha, Poister, Wright, & Thomas, 2017). As a consequence, the satisfaction with the organization decreases.…”
Section: Organizational Focus On Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leadership is a vague notion that must be conceptualized clearly when studied (e.g. Bass, 1985;Rost, 1993;Yukl, 2002;van Wart, 2013;Pasha et al, 2017). In this research, we focus on activities of organizational leaders who have a primary or sole focus on employees (van Wart, 2013).…”
Section: Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a general sense that pro-environmental leadership actions are lacking at all levels of government (Gallagher, 2012;Niu et al, 2018), reflected in delays in climate change action, slow funding growth (Wang, Hawkins, Lebredo, & Berman, 2012;Wang & Berman, 2014), and insufficient intergovernmental and international collaboration (McGuire & Silvia, 2010). A deficit in leadership behaviours that could have salient impact on motivating followers' proenvironmental actions is highlighted by the urgent need for sustainable urban transformation (Block & Paredis, 2013;Pasha, Poister, Wright, & Thomas, 2017;Gamso, 2018). These deficiencies are augmented by the fact that we know little about government leaders' motives for engaging in pro-environmental actions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%