1979
DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(79)90024-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming capacities and defectiveness of avian leukemia viruses OK10 and E26

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1A). By comparison, medium of a culture infected with nondefective OKAV (5,8) and labeled in the same way as the nonproducer culture produced a sharp peak of OKAV 32P-labeled virions at a density of 1.18 g/ml that contained about 10-fold more radioactivity per isotope added to the culture than the peak obtained from medium of nonThe publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisment" in accordance with 18 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1A). By comparison, medium of a culture infected with nondefective OKAV (5,8) and labeled in the same way as the nonproducer culture produced a sharp peak of OKAV 32P-labeled virions at a density of 1.18 g/ml that contained about 10-fold more radioactivity per isotope added to the culture than the peak obtained from medium of nonThe publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisment" in accordance with 18 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DVP production by OK10-transformed quail nonproducer cells (5,8) was monitored by subjecting the growth media of cultures labeled with 32P043-for 6 hr to standard procedures used for the purification of infectious avian tumor viruses (9,21,22). 32P-Labeled material banding between 1.15 and 1.19 g/ml with a broad peak at 1.17 g/ml was released by OK10-transformed nonproducer cells (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, 'blood smear analysis shows a preponderance of immature cells of erythroid origin (5,6). Cells from the buffy coat were cultured in vitro and grew within a period of [3][4][5][6][7][8] electrophoresis and RNA fractions were hybridized to cloned AMV-specific proviral DNA. Specific hybridization was observed with the 5.7-kb RNA component and smaller degradation products but not with the 8.5-kb E26AV RNA (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, on the basis of in vitro transformation assays and in vivo studies it was proposed to reclassify E26 as a myeloblastosis virus (2)(3)(4). However, recent analyses of differentiation parameters of leukemic cells from chicken and quail clearly indicated that, in vivo, the primary hematopoietic target cell for E26 belongs to the erythroid lineage but also includes some myeloid cells (5,6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E26 induced an erythroblast (Sotirov, 1981) that exhibited a more dierentiated phenotype than those seen in erythroid disease induced by the previously identi®ed Avian Erythroblastosis virus (AEV). However, like another virus, AMV (Avian Myeloblastosis virus), the E26 virus could also transform myeloblasts in vivo and in vitro (Graf et al, 1978;1979;Moscovici et al, 1981;Radke et al, 1982). In addition, E26 could transform quail ®broblasts in tissue culture (Graf et al, 1979) and this property, together with its ability to induce a novel erythroid disease, suggested the E26 virus represented a unique isolate dierent from AMV or the erythroblastosis-inducing AEV.…”
Section: The Avian Erythroleukemia Virus E26 Identi®es the ®Rst Ets Genementioning
confidence: 99%