2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2575.2000.00081.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transforming information systems development through computer‐aided systems engineering (CASE): lessons from practice

Abstract: Abstract. In dealing with the challenges posed by the ongoing problem of developing and integrating an evermore complex and diverse range of information systems in a timely manner, practitioners continue to grapple with important issues such as increasing developer productivity and bringing quality improvements to the process and product of systems development. Many organizations have adopted computer‐aided systems engineering (CASE) tools with such outcomes in mind. With few exceptions, previous research into… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another important aspect of a system development project is that it usually includes a certain level of novelty and creativity [13], and therefore, a certain degree of uncertainty is inherent. This aspect projects onto the development process, which is also characterized by having a degree of uncertainty, and often requires the tailoring of past knowledge and methods to a specific design situation before they can be applied [7,37,44,48].…”
Section: Ontology Of Development Process Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another important aspect of a system development project is that it usually includes a certain level of novelty and creativity [13], and therefore, a certain degree of uncertainty is inherent. This aspect projects onto the development process, which is also characterized by having a degree of uncertainty, and often requires the tailoring of past knowledge and methods to a specific design situation before they can be applied [7,37,44,48].…”
Section: Ontology Of Development Process Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 4 summarizes our evaluation of SPEM for DPD, based on analysis of the current SPEM 2.0 specification [37], existing literature 13 , and personal experience of using SPEM.…”
Section: Spem Evaluation For Dpdmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…He argues that rather than representing an objective truth, the output of an IS embodies an objective reality and therefore remains to be interpreted by users. This phenomenological view has had radical implications for the design of IS (see Avison & Wood‐Harper, 1990; Rathswohl 1991; Boland et al ., 1994; Coyne, 1995; Butler, 2000) as well as the interpretation of practices and artefacts related to IT (Lee, 1994; Klecun‐Dabrowska & Cornford, 2000; Introna & Ilharco, 2004).…”
Section: Meta‐theories Associated With Interpretivist Research and Powermentioning
confidence: 99%