2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103476
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transgenerational accumulation of methylome changes discovered in commercially reared honey bee (Apis mellifera) queens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The left ovaries of the newly emerged samples were dissected under a microscope. Ovaries were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde fix solution for 16 h and paraffin sections of the ovary were created using methods described by Yi et al 68 .…”
Section: Paraffin Sectioning Of the Queen Ovarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The left ovaries of the newly emerged samples were dissected under a microscope. Ovaries were then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde fix solution for 16 h and paraffin sections of the ovary were created using methods described by Yi et al 68 .…”
Section: Paraffin Sectioning Of the Queen Ovarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sections were photographed and overioles counted under the same microscope (40X) according to our previous methods 68 .…”
Section: Paraffin Sectioning Of the Queen Ovarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This modification has been reported to play an important role in the caste differentiation, brain plasticity, and body development of honey bees [ 16 ]. For instance, differences in queen and worker larval diets induce changes in DNA methylation contributing to queen–worker dimorphism [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 ]. In addition, a genome-wide association has been reported among differential gene expression, splicing, and differential DNA methylation the overlapped GO terms point to nutrition-related activity in primitively eusocial Bombus terrestris.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In insect species where DNA methylation is present, DNA methylation is largely confined to genic regions and elevated in coding regions (Bonasio et al, 2012;Feng et al, 2010;Lyko et al, 2010;Suzuki & Bird, 2008;Zemach et al, 2010). Gene body methylation has been suggested to affect gene expression and function via alternative splicing (Bonasio et al, 2012;Flores et al, 2012;Foret et al, 2012;Libbrecht et al, 2016;Li-Byarlay et al, 2013;Lyko et al, 2010), nucleosome stability (Hunt et al, 2013) or regulation of transcription elongation (Bird, 2002;Lorincz et al, 2004;Luco et al, 2010;Maunakea et al, 2010;Zilberman & Henikoff, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA methylation has been largely studied by whole-genome bisulphite sequencing (BS-seq) for different samples, probing a wide variety of developmental and environmental conditions (Cingolani et al, 2013;Drewell et al, 2014;Feng et al, 2010;Foret et al, 2012;Galbraith et al, 2015;Harris et al, 2019;He et al, 2017;Herb et al, 2012Herb et al, , 2018Li et al, 2017;Li-Byarlay et al, 2013;Lyko et al, 2010;Remnant et al, 2016;Xu et al, 2019;Yagound et al, 2019Yagound et al, , 2020Yao Yi et al, 2020;Zemach et al, 2010). Although all studies have reported low levels of DNA methylation, restricted almost exclusively to cytosines in CpG context, it has been difficult to compare studies even on the same species due to several factors: (1) potential differences in data quality control; (2) use of different computational methods and detection thresholds; and (3) mapping of BS-seq reads to different genome assemblies and annotation versions (Elsik et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%