2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02917526
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient Analysis and Leakage Detection Algorithm using GA and HS algorithm for a Pipeline System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although HSO has shown to be effective in most engineering optimization problems (Lee et al, 2004, Geem et al, 2005, Geem, 2006,Kim et al, 2006, it has not been applied yet to scheduling issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although HSO has shown to be effective in most engineering optimization problems (Lee et al, 2004, Geem et al, 2005, Geem, 2006,Kim et al, 2006, it has not been applied yet to scheduling issues.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Time-dependent study of hydraulics in a pressurized pipeline system was carried out in an alternative manner along with improvement in calibration methods concerned with pipeline leak detection. 19 Numerical analysis through the neural network is proposed for the rational and accurate treatment of nonactive supports resulting from the unilateral boundary conditions existing at the pipe vessel interface. 20 Accounting of fluid-structure interaction in pipeline system during unsteady flow modeling is becoming viable through the development of relevant numerical and analytical models.…”
Section: Literature Review and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HS algorithm has been successfully applied to various real-world optimization problems such as structural design [7][8], water network design [9][10][11], traffic routing [12][13], fluid leakage detection [14], and model parameter calibration [15][16]. HS even found better solution within much less time for water pump switching problem than branch and bound method originally coded in IBM subroutine or Microsoft Excel Solver [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%