2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2004.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient burning rate of a noncharring plate under a forced flow boundary layer flame

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…L is the characteristic length, taken as x p . And Δ T is the difference between the peak temperature and the molten surface temperature Nux=0.508Pr1true/20.952+Pr1true/4Grx1true/4 where Gr is the Grashof number, given as Gr = gα Δ tl 3 / ν 2 , and Pr is Prandtl number.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L is the characteristic length, taken as x p . And Δ T is the difference between the peak temperature and the molten surface temperature Nux=0.508Pr1true/20.952+Pr1true/4Grx1true/4 where Gr is the Grashof number, given as Gr = gα Δ tl 3 / ν 2 , and Pr is Prandtl number.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental set-up consists of a 15 cm square cross-sectional wind tunnel at the end of which we place a sample cable across the exit. A detailed description of the wind tunnel has been presented in earlier papers [13,15,16]. A schematic of the setup is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial transient effects associated with flame spread are eliminated by obtaining the burning rate from the slope of the regression. Krishnamurthy and Williams [18], Ananth et al [19], and Ndubizu et al [20] measured average local regression rates in forced flows from thickness changes between the beginning and the end of the tests. These time-averaged regression rates differ from steadystate rates as they include transient effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%