2014
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stu567
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transit timing analysis in the HAT-P-32 system

Abstract: We present the results of 45 transit observations obtained for the transiting exoplanet HAT-P-32b. The transits have been observed using several telescopes mainly throughout the YETI network. In 25 cases, complete transit light curves with a timing precision better than 1.4 min have been obtained. These light curves have been used to refine the system properties, namely inclination i, planet-to-star radius ratio R p /R s , and the ratio between the semimajor axis and the stellar radius a/R s . First analyses b… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
30
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We find our results for the planet parameters to be consistent with the literature values. The difference in radius ratio compared to the results of Hartman et al (2011) and Seeliger et al (2014) might be explained by the different wavelength region probed in this study but is more likely caused by the transit depth dilution from additional flux of the M-dwarf companion HAT-P-32B, which was not accounted for in these two studies. A rough dilution correction of the given radius ratios using…”
Section: Results and Discussion Of The White Light Curvescontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We find our results for the planet parameters to be consistent with the literature values. The difference in radius ratio compared to the results of Hartman et al (2011) and Seeliger et al (2014) might be explained by the different wavelength region probed in this study but is more likely caused by the transit depth dilution from additional flux of the M-dwarf companion HAT-P-32B, which was not accounted for in these two studies. A rough dilution correction of the given radius ratios using…”
Section: Results and Discussion Of The White Light Curvescontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…Not fixing the values but letting them vary in their uncertainty intervals did not change our final results for the relative wavelength-dependent change in radius ratio, but did only offset the exact value around which the narrow band radius ratios and limb darkening coefficients varied. The same held true when we fixed the wavelengthindependent and white light transit parameters to the literature values provided by Gibson et al (2013b), Hartman et al (2011) or Seeliger et al (2014. Between these tested configurations adopting our best fit Run 1 white light parameters did yield the lowest overall χ 2 .…”
Section: Analysis Of the Color Light Curves Of Runmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…After the discovery of a group of inflated planets (e.g. WASP-17b, TrES-4b and HAT-P-32, Anderson et al 2011;Sozzetti et al 2015;Seeliger et al 2014), several theories invoking tidal friction, enhanced atmospheric opacities, turbulent mixing, ohmic dissipation, windshocks, or more exotic mechanisms have been proposed to account for the slow cooling rate of these planets, resulting in an unexpectedly large radius (see e.g. Baraffe et al 2014;Spiegel & Burrows 2013;Ginzburg & Sari 2015, and references therein).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%