2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0078819
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition metal halide nanowires: A family of one-dimensional multifunctional building blocks

Abstract: Low-dimensional materials with definite geometrical and electronic structures have long been pursued to fulfill the requirement of technological devices toward miniaturization, multifunctionality, and precise manufacturing. Inspired by the emerging transition metal halide monolayers with intriguing magnetic behavior, here we systematically explore stable one-dimensional (1D) structures of transition metal halides. By first-principles calculations, a total of 208 TMX2 and TMX3 (TM is 3d, 4d, 5d transition metal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There exist some TMHs with intrinsic 1D crystal structures in stoichiometries of MX 2 (e.g., CrCl 2 , NiBr 2 , and CoI 2 ) , and MX 3 (e.g., TiCl 3 , RuBr 3 , and MoBr 3 ), , wherein each chain of transition metal atoms is bridged by four and six halogen atoms, respectively. From the calculated energetic view, TMH 1D ACs in the form of MX 3 are generally more stable than MX 2 ACs, while the F-based TMHs are more stable than the other TMH ACs . As for material properties, there is less understanding of TMH ACs compared to TMC ACs.…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There exist some TMHs with intrinsic 1D crystal structures in stoichiometries of MX 2 (e.g., CrCl 2 , NiBr 2 , and CoI 2 ) , and MX 3 (e.g., TiCl 3 , RuBr 3 , and MoBr 3 ), , wherein each chain of transition metal atoms is bridged by four and six halogen atoms, respectively. From the calculated energetic view, TMH 1D ACs in the form of MX 3 are generally more stable than MX 2 ACs, while the F-based TMHs are more stable than the other TMH ACs . As for material properties, there is less understanding of TMH ACs compared to TMC ACs.…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to TMC ACs that usually exhibit metallic behaviors, most TMH ACs are semiconductors (e.g., 58 MX 2 and 86 MX 3 ) with bandgaps widely manipulated from 0.10 to 6.71 eV, thereby promising for electronic, optoelectronic, and light-harvesting devices. For most of the 1D TMH semiconductors, their effective masses of electron carriers are calculated to be below 0.3 m 0 , suggesting that the electron carriers are highly mobile, being useful for fast electronics. Among them, some TMH ACs, such as MBr 3 (M = Sc, Y), IrX 3 , and RhX 3 ACs with bandgaps of 1.55–2.99 eV, show a strong light absorption intensity up to 10 5 cm –1 , covering the ultraviolet and visible regime, highlighting their capability to capture solar energy .…”
Section: Structural Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations