2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2003.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transitions in C II, N III, and O IV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculated transition energies are in good agreement with observed transition energies obtained from [25]. In Table 4 we compare electric dipole transition rates with rates taken from MR RCI [9,11], MCHF [8], CIV3 [12] calculations and values taken from NIST [25]. In this table we give rates in both the Babushkin and Coulomb gauges.…”
Section: Results and Evaluation Of Datasupporting
confidence: 66%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Calculated transition energies are in good agreement with observed transition energies obtained from [25]. In Table 4 we compare electric dipole transition rates with rates taken from MR RCI [9,11], MCHF [8], CIV3 [12] calculations and values taken from NIST [25]. In this table we give rates in both the Babushkin and Coulomb gauges.…”
Section: Results and Evaluation Of Datasupporting
confidence: 66%
“…4). The results for the energies, transition rates and lifetimes are compared with the earlier available values obtained from calculations in the Breit-Pauli approximation [6], in the relativistic configuration interaction method [9,10], in CIV3 method [12] and also with experimental measurements. Results from our present calculations are in very good agreement with other theoretical methods, also as with experimental values.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We note, however, that we have replaced the A-values of the transitions among the lowest levels as calculated by Liang et al (2012) with autostructure with more accurate values, whenever available. For example, those calculated by Corrégé & Hibbert (2004) with the CIV3 code (Hibbert 1975) and those calculated by Rynkun et al (2012) with the multi-configuration DiracHartree-Fock (MCDHF) GRASP2K code (Jönsson et al 2007). This is because the ab initio energies of the CIV3 and GRASP2K are normally more accurate than those by autostructure, and so are the A-values.…”
Section: Li-like Ionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…comm.) The radiative transition probabilities (A-values) for ground forbidden transitions have been taken from Flower & Nussbaumer (1975), while for the allowed transitions 2s 2 2p − 2s2p 2 and 2s 2 2p − 2s 2 3s the values from Corrégé & Hibbert (2004) are used. All others are taken from NIST.…”
Section: Atomic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%