2014
DOI: 10.1353/ajm.2014.0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translate of horospheres and counting problems

Abstract: Abstract. Let G be a semisimple Lie group without compact factors, Γ be an irreducible lattice in G. In the first part of the article we give the necessary and sufficient condition under which a sequence of translates of probability "horospherical measures" is convergent. And the limiting measure is also determined when it is convergent (see Theorems 1 and 2 for the precise statements). In the second part, two applications are presented. The first one is of geometric nature and the second one gives an alternat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
26
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
26
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In the rank one case (n = 2) it was shown by Eskin and McMullen [5] that the quantity in Equation 4 is asymptotic to the volume of B(x, R) (times a suitable constant). The analogous result for higher rank (n > 2) was established by Mohammadi and Salehi-Golsefidy [13]. Our first theorem is an effective form of this result for G = SL n (R).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the rank one case (n = 2) it was shown by Eskin and McMullen [5] that the quantity in Equation 4 is asymptotic to the volume of B(x, R) (times a suitable constant). The analogous result for higher rank (n > 2) was established by Mohammadi and Salehi-Golsefidy [13]. Our first theorem is an effective form of this result for G = SL n (R).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…A horospherical subgroup is minimal if it is the unipotent radical of a maximal parabolic subgroup, and it is maximal if it is the unipotent radical of a minimal parabolic subgroup. 2 In [13] this theorem is proved in much greater generality, e.g. G does not necessarily have to be Q-split.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations