Translating knowledge to build technological competence

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to present a review of literature that establishes the factors affecting the ability of an organisation to absorb and apply knowledge. The review aims to draw from literature on the resource‐based view of the firm, dynamic capabilities, organisational learning, knowledge management and technological innovation. The paper then seeks to present a model of knowledge translation capability synthesised from the literature review.Design/methodology/approachThe model that is synthesised from the literature review draws on three streams of work. First, the work of Dorothy Leonard on technological capability; second, the I‐space model of knowledge assets developed by Max Boisot; and third, other work based in the organisational learning and innovation management literature. The model is illustrated using a case study of an innovation project.FindingsThe effective development of a knowledge translation capability requires attention to a network of both formal and informal structures/activities across an organisation. Together these activities constitute a dynamic capability that operates iteratively throughout the whole organisation and are an example of triple‐loop learning processes.Practical implicationsThe paper will prove useful to other academics in the area of technological innovation and practising managers who can use the model to evaluate their own organisation's knowledge translation capability.Originality/valueThe advantage of the model presented is that, unlike other discussions of dynamic capability, the link between conceptual level description and real world activities has been made more distinct. By recognising relevant organisational structures and relationships, it becomes possible to takes steps to assess their performance and then manage their improvement.

Capable design or designing capabilities? An exploration of service design as an emerging organizational capability in Telenor – Martinkenaite

“…The concept of dynamic capabilities is defined as the "capacity to renew competences so as to achieve congruence with the changing business environment" (Teece et al, 1997, p. 516). The extant literature is adamant that dynamic capabilities are built and cannot be bought in a market (Collis, 1994;Makadok, 2001;Savory, 2006;Teece et al, 1997). In this respect, the dynamic capability literature clearly shows the connection to the theoretical origins of the RBV, and the underpinning assumption that resources and capabilities explain competitive heterogeneity (Helfat, 2000).…”

Estratégia Organizacional Social e Ambientalmente Responsável: A Articulação entre a Competência Essencial e a Vantagem Competitiva em um Aterro Sanitário

“…Para o autor, os recursos internos da organização devem ser utilizados através da experiência e know-how dos gestores. Savory (2006) atenta que para obter a vantagem competitiva, os gestores devem estar estrategicamente alinhados, a fim de entender e manejar os recursos e habilidades, utilizando-os como competências essenciais.…”

Gestão baseada em capacidades para novas empresas de base tecnológica: framework para Gestão do Processo de Conversão de Tecnologias

“…Esta modificação de conhecimento é o cerne da evolução da empresa e decorre do processo de desconectar capacidades de produtos existentes e de (re)conectá-las em novos produtos. Para uma eficiente conversão da tecnologia em produtos e processos comercialmente viáveis, a empresa desenvolve novas rotinas e capacidades (habilidades), necessitando, às vezes (dependendo do nível almejado de inovação), gerar um modelo de negócio distinto do anteriormente existente (Abernathy & Clark, 1985;Aldrich & Ruef, 2006;Burgelman et al, 2004;Chesbrough & Rosenbloom, 2002;Danneels, 2002;Grant, 1996;Helfat & Peteraf, 2003;Mathews, 2006;Nelson & Winter, 1982;Savory, 2006;Zahra & Sapienza, 2006).…”