2016
DOI: 10.1177/1090198115605309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translating the Socio-Ecological Perspective Into Multilevel Interventions

Abstract: Multilevel interventions are inspired by socio-ecological models, and seek to create change on various levels-for example by increasing the health literacy of individuals as well as modifying the social norms within a community. Despite becoming a buzzword in public health, actual multilevel interventions remain scarce. In this commentary, we explore the operational and empirical barriers to designing and implementing multilevel interventions, and argue that the current theoretical framework based on the socio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
61
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The socio‐ecological framework (Bronfenbrenner, ) is purported to inspire multi‐level interventions, yet frequently, public health interventions have single‐level targets and are focused on intrapersonal change (Schölmerich and Kawachi, ). Drawing from the ecological framework (Bronfenbrenner, ), the eco‐social approach (Krieger, ), the health promotion adaption of the socio‐ecological framework (McLeroy et al, ) and the ‘Me, We, Us’ framework (Jarden and Jarden, ), an example of what a multi‐level workplace well‐being intervention programme might look like is depicted in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The socio‐ecological framework (Bronfenbrenner, ) is purported to inspire multi‐level interventions, yet frequently, public health interventions have single‐level targets and are focused on intrapersonal change (Schölmerich and Kawachi, ). Drawing from the ecological framework (Bronfenbrenner, ), the eco‐social approach (Krieger, ), the health promotion adaption of the socio‐ecological framework (McLeroy et al, ) and the ‘Me, We, Us’ framework (Jarden and Jarden, ), an example of what a multi‐level workplace well‐being intervention programme might look like is depicted in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of important perspectives of target communities and populations can also be captured in other paradigms and frameworks such as CBPR (Salimi et al, 2012), socioecological frameworks (Scholmerich & Kawachi, 2016), the Cultural Framework for Health (Kagawa-Singer et al, 2015), Persuasive Marketing (Jenkin et al, 2014), social marketing for systems change/community-based prevention marketing (Bryant et al, 2007) and the RE-AIM framework (Glasgow et al, 2003). However, ensuring D&I concepts are understood by communities is a critical aspect of D&I. Collaborating with stakeholders is an important step in the D&I process as the developers of the original intervention may not be aware of important cultural nuances that are needed to successfully adapt interventions that ultimately lead to more successful D&I.…”
Section: The Connect Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These identified levels of influence align with the five constructs outlined in the socio-ecological model of health promotion (intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional/organisational, community, and public policy), which provided a useful guide to interpret the findings in the following discussion [9,31]. Applying these frameworks in combination facilitated a more holistic view, with our study framework illustrating links between the varying levels of the socio-ecological model [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%