2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.08.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and Psychometric Testing of the Persian Version of the Spiritual Needs Questionnaire Among Elders With Chronic Diseases

Abstract: The SpNQ-PV showed a minor difference in structuring and indicated good psychometric properties, which can be used to assess the spiritual needs of Iranian elders suffering from chronic diseases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The Inner Peace needs domain of the Lithuanian version of SpNQ-20 had the lowest internal consistency (α = 0.69) in relation to other domains: Religious needs (α = 0.93), Existential needs (α = 0.83) and Giving/Generativity and Forgiveness needs (α = 0.75). These measures corresponded with the psychometric assessment of the Persian version of SpNQ (Moeini et al, 2018) and were rather similar to Chinese versions of the instrument (with exception to Inner peace needs and Giving/Generativity and Forgiveness needs domains) (Büssing et al, 2013a) and original SpNQ validation (with the Religious needs and Existential needs domains as the most consistent in relation to two others) (Büssing et al, 2010). Split-half correlation to assess how well components of SpNQ contribute to the construct that was being measured, i.e.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The Inner Peace needs domain of the Lithuanian version of SpNQ-20 had the lowest internal consistency (α = 0.69) in relation to other domains: Religious needs (α = 0.93), Existential needs (α = 0.83) and Giving/Generativity and Forgiveness needs (α = 0.75). These measures corresponded with the psychometric assessment of the Persian version of SpNQ (Moeini et al, 2018) and were rather similar to Chinese versions of the instrument (with exception to Inner peace needs and Giving/Generativity and Forgiveness needs domains) (Büssing et al, 2013a) and original SpNQ validation (with the Religious needs and Existential needs domains as the most consistent in relation to two others) (Büssing et al, 2010). Split-half correlation to assess how well components of SpNQ contribute to the construct that was being measured, i.e.…”
Section: Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Existential (deep thinking/meaning) (α=0.84): To think about the past life, talk with someone about the meaning of life/suffering, reveal some aspects of life, and talk about the possibility of another life after death 4. Active forgiveness/productivity (α=0.82): To have an active or automatic intention to sympathize with others, transfer life experiences to others, and ensure that life has been meaningful and valuable (12) The validity and reliability of the Persian version of the questionnaire were confirmed by the researcher (13). The third questionnaire was the hospital anxiety and depression scale, which measures anxiety and depression in the patients.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, at the time of writing our review, Büssing and colleagues further published an article increasing the validity of this measure by examining the structure of the SpNQ in a large sample of ill and healthy younger and elderly adults (n-2095) (Büssing et al 2018). The SpNQ has also been translated into several languages including Chinese (Bussing et al 2013a) and Persian (Moeini et al 2018).…”
Section: Self-reporting Measures (Spiritual Needs and Distress)mentioning
confidence: 99%