2017
DOI: 10.1590/0004-282x20170103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and validation of the Life Satisfaction Index for Adolescents scale with neuromuscular disorders: LSI-A Brazil

Abstract: Objective: To validate the Life Satisfaction Index for Adolescents (LSI-A) scale, parent version and patient version, for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD). Methods: The parent version of the instrument was divided into Groups A, B, C and D; and the patient version, divided into B, C and D. For the statistical calculation, the following tests were used: Cronbach's α, ICC, Pearson and the ROC Curve. Results: The parent and patient versions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hu et al (2013) [67] assessed the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the PedsQL 3.0 NMM in Chinese children with DMD. Simon et al (2017) [56] assessed comprehensibility of the LSIA in Brazilian children with DMD, and comprehensiveness in professionals. However, both of these studies received ratings of doubtful due to at least some unclear details/suspected problems within the qualitative methods used.…”
Section: Content Validityappraisal Of Content Validity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hu et al (2013) [67] assessed the relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility of the PedsQL 3.0 NMM in Chinese children with DMD. Simon et al (2017) [56] assessed comprehensibility of the LSIA in Brazilian children with DMD, and comprehensiveness in professionals. However, both of these studies received ratings of doubtful due to at least some unclear details/suspected problems within the qualitative methods used.…”
Section: Content Validityappraisal Of Content Validity Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%