Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Short-Form 6D on the General Population in Indonesia

Andayani, Tri Murti; Kristina, Susi Ari; Endarti, Dwi; Haris, Restu Nur Hasanah; Rahmawati, Anindya

doi:10.1016/j.vhri.2019.11.004

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…First, the expert compares the original questionnaire and the translation results to ensure equality in terms of semantics, idiomatic, and concepts and ensure that respondents can accept and understand the questionnaire because they have clear instructions. 16,17 After that, the three experts filled out a questionnaire to re-assess the modified questionnaire according to Indonesian culture with criteria relevance (1= not relevant, 2=item need some revision, appropriate but need minor modification), clarity (1=not clear, 2=item need some correction, 3=clear but need minor revision, 4=very clear), simplicity (1=not simple, 2=item need some revision, 3=simple but need minor revision, 4=very simple) and ambiguity (1=doubtful, 2=item need some revision, 3=no doubt but need minor revision, 4=meaning is clear). CVI measured content validity based on relevance, clarity, simplicity, and ambiguity.…”

Section: Face and Content Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian hypertension self-management questionnaire in South Sumatera, Indonesia

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Poor self-management has been associated with uncontrolled blood pressure in hypertensive patients. A valid instrument is needed to assess the self-management of hypertensive patients, especially to measure self-management changes after health workers' intervention. Objective: To examine the psychometric properties Persian Hypertension Self-Management Questionnaire among patients with hypertension in Indonesia. Methods: Data collection was carried out cross-sectionally using convenience sampling; obtained 407 hypertensive patients in ten primary health centers in South Sumatra Province. The translation of the questionnaire has been carried out by applying forward-backward methods. The Face validity test based on respondents' responses to each question item was evaluated descriptively. We evaluated content validity by an expert with qualitative and quantitative; known group validity was analyzed using chi-square. Internal consistency reliability test using Cronbach alpha and test-retest reliability using Pearson correlation test or Pearson Spearman rank correlation. Results: Content validity by the expert shows sentence improvement, and CVI value = 1.00. Face validity shows that respondents can understand well to the questionnaire, and the known group validity was considered very good, as indicated by a significant relationship between the level of self-management and blood pressure control (p <0.001). The reliability assessment on internal consistency was 0.823 with a range of values for each domain, namely 0.710 -0.823, and Test-retest reliability of 0.707 (p <0.001) with values ranging from 0.600 -0.906. Conclusions: The Persian Hypertension Self-Management Questionnaire has been translated into the Indonesian version and has satisfactory validity and reliability for assessing self-management in hypertensive patients in Indonesia.

show abstract

Section: Face and Content Validitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian hypertension self-management questionnaire in South Sumatera, Indonesia

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The score is then converted into a utility value of 0.29 to 1.0 using the SF-Converter program developed by the University of Sheffield. The SF-6D questionnaire is available in the Indonesian version, and it has been tested for its validation and reliability to the population in Yogyakarta City, where the results of the internal consistency reliability test show the Cronbach alpha coefficient value of 0.752 (r > 0.5), which indicates that the Indonesian version of the SF-6D instrument has good reliability (Andayani et al, 2020).…”

Section: Equipmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Short Form-6 Dimension (SF-6D) Validity and Reliability in Hemodialysis Patients

Fatihah

Andayani

Yasin

2021

JFIKI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Quality of life becomes an important parameter that is needed for assessing the clinical outcome of patients undergoing long-term therapy for chronic diseases, such as chronic kidney failure. Short Form-6 Dimension (SF-6D) is one of the generic instruments that can be used to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The psychometric properties SF-6D test in hemodialysis patients in Indonesia has never been conducted. Objective: Aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of SF-6D questionnaire in Indonesian version in patients with chronic kidney failure. Methods: This is an observational study with a cross-sectional design involving 117 patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the hemodialysis unit in Dr. Sardjito Central General Hospital and UGM Academic Hospital Yogyakarta. Results: The SF-6D questionnaire has good internal consistency, as seen in Cronbach's alpha value of 0.771. In this study, the ceiling effect test showed 6.8% (< 15%). The measurement of convergent validity was carried out using Spearman rho to analyze the correlation of the questionnaires and see its correlation with other instruments (KDQOL-SF36). Based on the research, the correlation coefficient value of 0.768 (> 0.75) indicates very good result for a strong correlation. The SF-6D instrument was able to distinguish the quality of life with a significant value (p < 0.05) in age, occupation, and comorbid groups. Conclusion: SF-6D questionnaire is valid and reliable, so it can be used to measure the HRQOL of hemodialysis patients. The mean SF-6D utility score of hemodialysis patients is high (0.7975 ± 0.1488).

show abstract

Comparison and validation of EuroQol-5 Dimension level and Short Form-6 Dimension in cataract patients

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and Short Form-6 dimension (SF-6D) are instruments that have been widely used to assess utility index as an outcome parameter in pharmacoeconomic studies. The choice of an instrument will have an important effect and can influence the decision making of an economic health evaluation. Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the SF-6D and EQ-5D instruments to assess utility index in cataract patients. Methods: The study was conducted with on 448 cataract patients in a hospital in Yogyakarta. The subjects of the study were outpatient cataract patients over 45 years of age. The patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was assessed using the SF-6D, EQ-5D, and visual function questionnaire instruments. The construct validity was tested including known group validity using the independent sample t test and ANOVA, convergent validity with the Spearman correlation, ceiling effect, and bland and Altmand plots. Results: A total of 448 cataract patients, mean age 64.7 (10.1) years, showed utility index assessed using the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D instruments, which were 0.7 (0.2) and 0.8 (0.1), respectively. Convergent validity shows that the EQ-5D-5L dimensions have a moderate to very strong correlation (0.4-0.9) with the dimensions on VFQ-25, as well as the SF-6D (0.4-0.8). The known group validity shows that both EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D can differentiate the patient's health status based on cataract surgery, visual acuity, and comorbidity. The Bland Altman plot shows the level of agreement between EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D of 91.7%. In better health status, the utility index of EQ-5D-5L is higher and vice versa, in the worse health status the utility index of SF-6D is higher. Conclusion: Both the EQ-5D-5L and SF-6D instruments are valid for assessing the utility index in cataract patients. By using different instruments, there are differences in the utility value of cataract patients based on their health status. Therefore it is necessary to consider in choosing the instrument in assessing utility as an outcome parameter in pharmacoeconomic study.

show abstract

Translation, Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Short-Form 6D on the General Population in Indonesia

Cited by 3 publications

References 34 publications

Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian hypertension self-management questionnaire in South Sumatera, Indonesia

Translation, cultural adaptation, and psychometric validation of the Persian hypertension self-management questionnaire in South Sumatera, Indonesia

The Short Form-6 Dimension (SF-6D) Validity and Reliability in Hemodialysis Patients

Comparison and validation of EuroQol-5 Dimension level and Short Form-6 Dimension in cataract patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About