1997
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.272.26.16247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation Initiation Factors eIF-iso4G and eIF-4B Interact with the Poly(A)-binding Protein and Increase Its RNA Binding Activity

Abstract: The 5-cap and the poly(A) tail act synergistically to increase the translational efficiency of eukaryotic mRNAs, which suggests that these two mRNA elements communicate during translation. We report here that the cap-associated eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs), i.e. the two isoforms of the cap-binding complex (eIF-4F and eIF-iso4F) and eIF-4B, bind to the poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) both in the presence and absence of poly(A) RNA. The interactions between PABP and eIF-4F, eIF-iso4F, and eIF-4B were meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
267
2
3

Year Published

1998
1998
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
14
267
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…We did, however, observe a complete loss of the PABP that co-puri®ed with eIF4E after antiFas treatment (Figure 9c; compare lanes 5 and 6). The latter result may indicate that PABP associates with eIF4G in mammalian eIF4F complexes, as is the case in yeast (Tarun and Sachs, 1996;Le et al, 1997), or that interaction of PABP with the eIF4G homologue PAIP (Craig et al, 1998) is also altered in cells undergoing apoptosis. The e ects of anti-Fas treatment on eIF4G and the co-puri®cation of PABP with eIF4E were blocked by Z-VAD.FMK (Figure 9c, lanes 2 vs 3 and lanes 6 vs 7), under conditions where this agent prevented the apoptotic response as measured by PARP cleavage (Figure 9a) or the appearance of cells with less than the G1 content of DNA (Figure 9b).…”
Section: Induction Of Apoptosis In Jurkat Cells Results In Loss Of Eif4gmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We did, however, observe a complete loss of the PABP that co-puri®ed with eIF4E after antiFas treatment (Figure 9c; compare lanes 5 and 6). The latter result may indicate that PABP associates with eIF4G in mammalian eIF4F complexes, as is the case in yeast (Tarun and Sachs, 1996;Le et al, 1997), or that interaction of PABP with the eIF4G homologue PAIP (Craig et al, 1998) is also altered in cells undergoing apoptosis. The e ects of anti-Fas treatment on eIF4G and the co-puri®cation of PABP with eIF4E were blocked by Z-VAD.FMK (Figure 9c, lanes 2 vs 3 and lanes 6 vs 7), under conditions where this agent prevented the apoptotic response as measured by PARP cleavage (Figure 9a) or the appearance of cells with less than the G1 content of DNA (Figure 9b).…”
Section: Induction Of Apoptosis In Jurkat Cells Results In Loss Of Eif4gmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The stability of eIF4G may be determined not only by the signalling pathways by which cells respond to stresses but also by the other proteins with which the factor associates. Binding sites for eIF4E, eIF4A, eIF3 and PABP have been characterized on eIF4G from various eukaryotic sources (Tarun and Sachs, 1996;Morley et al, 1997;Le et al, 1997;. The in¯uence of these proteins on eIF4G stability in vivo remains unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Adding eIF4E, eIF4G, PABP, and a capped and polyadenylated mRNA together in vitro resulted in the formation of pseudocircular complexes. (81) PABP and eIF4G also interact in plant (82) and mammalian cells. (83,84) Interestingly, there is no apparent sequence homology between the PABP-binding regions of yeast and mammalian eIF4G, despite the evolutionary conservation of the eIF4G-PABP interaction.…”
Section: Assembly Of the 80s Ribosomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This complex is supposed to promote the initiation of translation of capped mRNA by promoting the recruitment of the 40S ribosomal subunit (40). In addition, the PABP was also demonstrated to interact with eukaryotic initiation factors (11,17). The interaction of PABP with different components of the preinitiation complex of translation might explain why a sequence located downstream of a coding region is able to control translation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%