2017
DOI: 10.1002/psp4.12270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational Model to Predict Pulmonary Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy in Man for Inhaled Bronchodilators

Abstract: Translational pharmacokinetic (PK) models are needed to describe and predict drug concentration‐time profiles in lung tissue at the site of action to enable animal‐to‐man translation and prediction of efficacy in humans for inhaled medicines. Current pulmonary PK models are generally descriptive rather than predictive, drug/compound specific, and fail to show successful cross‐species translation. The objective of this work was to develop a robust compartmental modeling approach that captures key features of lu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With the results (Table ) from the lung delivery and disposition model (Figure C and Figure ), it should be clear that the F A value was an underestimate due to a loss of the inhaler's delivery efficiency (F deliv = 0.22); and the k A and k abs values were overestimates due to the rate constant of lung non‐absorptive disposition (k nad = 0.48 h −1 ). Mathematically, the following relationships were found among these parameters: FA=Fdeliv×Fabs kA=kabs=ka+knad By now, many different modeling approaches have been attempted for accurately interpreting and predicting the PK profiles of inhaled drugs and products in humans (Bäckman et al, ; Borghardt et al, ; Byron, ; Hendrickx et al, ; Jones & Harrison, ; Weber & Hochhaus, ). Among them, with an advent of computation software, such as Gastroplus™, PK‐SIM™ and SimCyp Simulator™, PBPK modeling has recently gained a great interest for use in various stages of inhaled drug and product development (Bäckman et al, ; Borghardt et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With the results (Table ) from the lung delivery and disposition model (Figure C and Figure ), it should be clear that the F A value was an underestimate due to a loss of the inhaler's delivery efficiency (F deliv = 0.22); and the k A and k abs values were overestimates due to the rate constant of lung non‐absorptive disposition (k nad = 0.48 h −1 ). Mathematically, the following relationships were found among these parameters: FA=Fdeliv×Fabs kA=kabs=ka+knad By now, many different modeling approaches have been attempted for accurately interpreting and predicting the PK profiles of inhaled drugs and products in humans (Bäckman et al, ; Borghardt et al, ; Byron, ; Hendrickx et al, ; Jones & Harrison, ; Weber & Hochhaus, ). Among them, with an advent of computation software, such as Gastroplus™, PK‐SIM™ and SimCyp Simulator™, PBPK modeling has recently gained a great interest for use in various stages of inhaled drug and product development (Bäckman et al, ; Borghardt et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several approaches have been attempted in order to clarify and predict the kinetic behavior of inhaled drugs in humans, including compartment model‐based simulation (Byron, ; Weber & Hochhaus, ), the scaled use of animal data (Hendrickx et al, ; Jones & Harrison, ), and multiplex physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling (Bäckman et al, ; Borghardt et al, ). However, to yield accurate and convincing outcomes, many variables and complexities uniquely inherent to inhaled aerosol delivery, deposition, and drug disposition must properly be taken into consideration (Bäckman et al, ; Hastedt et al, ; Sakagami & Gumbleton, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, micro-kinetic models suggest that the retention of β-agonists is due to the interaction with the phospholipid membrane to produce a depot for maintenance of local efficacious drug concentrations around the target receptor (Sykes et al., 2014 ). The multiphasic lung profile of β-agonist bronchodilators ( Figure 1(c) ) has recently been characterized with a pharmacokinetic model structure with both a shallow (rapidly equilibrating) and deep (slowly equilibrating) lung compartment (Hendrickx et al., 2017 ) where the release of drug from the unidentified deep compartment provides the lung retention. In contrast, Borghardt et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, E denotes the effect associated with a given C u,bronchi , E max represents the maximum attainable effect (here 100%), and the EC 50,free represents the unbound concentration needed to achieve half-maximal effect. To exemplify the impact for the example of SAL, the EC 50 for SAL was taken from Hendrickx et al [8], who measured the inhibition of methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction and found an EC 50 of 36 nM (total lung concentration). This value was scaled to unbound concentrations using the fraction unbound in plasma (f u,plasma ) and the estimated K p in bronchi (K p,B ):…”
Section: Modelling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local pulmonary tissue PK and therefore the local tissue retention is determined by two aspects, first the tissue affinity and second the local perfusion. Due to experimental difficulties, investigations of pulmonary tissue retention have been mostly qualitative in nature [6,7] or were based on empirical estimation of tissue distribution or absorption rate constants [8,9]. A more mechanistic quantitative determination of pulmonary disposition kinetics remains challenging for various reasons: First, after inhalation the variability in the PK is typically much higher compared to other routes of administration, so that a larger data set is required to infer on the pulmonary tissue retention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%