2014
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TRANSMISSION ADVANTAGE FAVORS SELFING ALLELE IN EXPERIMENTAL POPULATIONS OF SELF-INCOMPATIBLEWITHERINGIA SOLANACEA(SOLANACEAE)

Abstract: The evolution of self-fertilization is one of the most commonly traversed transitions in flowering plants, with profound implications for population genetic structure and evolutionary potential. We investigated factors influencing this transition using Witheringia solanacea, a predominantly self-incompatible species within which self-compatible genotypes have been identified. We showed that self-compatibility in this species segregates with variation at the S-locus as inherited by plants in F1 and F2 generatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead of individual selection, transitions to androdioecy in natural Caenorhabditis may have resulted from a correlated response to density dependent selection among demes for dispersal to and/or colonization of novel habitats where outcrossing was not necessarily limited [36,37,39]. The lack of a cost of meiosis in Caenorhabditis, since hermaphrodites do not outcross each other, and the existence of a cost of males in outcrossing lineages would then make certain that the first selfing colonizers would outcompete outcrossers reaching the same habitat at a later time, see for example [22] for an empirical example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead of individual selection, transitions to androdioecy in natural Caenorhabditis may have resulted from a correlated response to density dependent selection among demes for dispersal to and/or colonization of novel habitats where outcrossing was not necessarily limited [36,37,39]. The lack of a cost of meiosis in Caenorhabditis, since hermaphrodites do not outcross each other, and the existence of a cost of males in outcrossing lineages would then make certain that the first selfing colonizers would outcompete outcrossers reaching the same habitat at a later time, see for example [22] for an empirical example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the considerable efforts trying to demonstrate the hypothesis of reproductive assurance, empirical evidence is mixed [18][19][20][21], and whether individual selection can drive the transition to selfing has not been subject to direct experimental tests; but see [22][23][24]. This is partly because hermaphroditism and selfing occur in multiple forms, not all of which clearly assure population persistence in environments with limited opportunity for outcrossing [17,[25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various factors have been suggested to favour the evolution of selfing (Goodwillie et al, 2005), but most research to date has focused on two main aspects (Busch and Delph, 2012). First, as initially proposed by Fisher (1941) and recently confirmed experimentally in a plant species (Stone et al, 2014), a gene responsible for selfing should automatically be selected and thus increase in frequency when emerging in a primarily outcrossing population because of its higher transmission rate (transmission advantage hypothesis). Second, from an ecological perspective, selfing can act as a reproductive assurance mechanism when mate availability is low (Darwin, 1876;Jain, 1976), as is the case for many organisms (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With a preponderance of recent transitions to selfing across many independent branches of the angiosperm phylogeny, there is ample raw material to address some of these questions (Goldberg et al 2012;Shimizu and Tsuchimatsu 2015). Study systems with intraspecific polymorphism in the degree of self-fertilization are particularly valuable to challenge hypotheses for the initial spread of mutations that cause shifts to partial self-fertilization in outcrossing populations (Stone et al 2014;Herman and Schoen 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spread of SC mutations that cause selfing at the S-locus involves an additional process beyond those that operate on selfing mutations in general. The corresponding outcross siring advantage enjoyed by SC mutations depends on the number of S-alleles, and can be estimated by comparing the success of SI and SC genotypes through outcross pollen (Busch and Schoen 2008;Stone et al 2014). This arises because pollen bearing functional S-alleles cannot fertilize ovules born by plants with matching specificities in the population-S-alleles cause plants to be both self-and cross-incompatible (Wright 1939;Vallejo-Marin and Uyenoyama 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%