2006
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2005.857838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission Loss Unbundling and Allocation Under Pool Electricity Markets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the system losses can represent 5%-10% of the total generation, a quantity worth several million dollars per year, their fair allocation among generators and loads has an important impact on their benefits [1]. However, the problem of loss allocation is not trivial due to its nonlinearity, and it is still being explored and developed [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As the system losses can represent 5%-10% of the total generation, a quantity worth several million dollars per year, their fair allocation among generators and loads has an important impact on their benefits [1]. However, the problem of loss allocation is not trivial due to its nonlinearity, and it is still being explored and developed [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above methods only achieve the allocation of total system losses. To realize the transparency and fairness of loss allocation, the losses at each branch should be unbundled [4], [14]. In [4] and [16], the losses at each branch are allocated to current injections by separating the losses in a natural way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [6], the concept of "center of losses" is applied to allocate losses to generations and loads with predefined loss proportion between them. Several circuitbased methods have been proposed in [7,8]. Those methods can integrate the network characteristics and circuit theories into flow and loss allocation, but they may produce negative loss allocation results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%