2014
DOI: 10.1089/pho.2013.3611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmission of Er:YAG Laser Through Different Dental Ceramics

Abstract: Ceramic type and thickness should be taken into consideration to adjust the laser irradiation parameters during laser debonding of adhesively luted all-ceramic restorations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
68
2
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
6
68
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, we used lithium disilicatereinforced ceramics with thicknesses of 0.5 mm. According to Sari et al [22], this results in 88 % transmission or 12 % absorption on porcelain surfaces, and our results show that the absorption may have positive effect on surface modification. Additionally, we could not find any weakness or bond failure between the dentine and PLV surfaces in our specimens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…In our study, we used lithium disilicatereinforced ceramics with thicknesses of 0.5 mm. According to Sari et al [22], this results in 88 % transmission or 12 % absorption on porcelain surfaces, and our results show that the absorption may have positive effect on surface modification. Additionally, we could not find any weakness or bond failure between the dentine and PLV surfaces in our specimens.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…2014 Sari et al published a study about the absorption and transmission of the Er:-YAG laser applied for 5 seconds through different types of ceramics [7]. The E-max press had the higher transmittance value.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sari et al [11] performed an interesting study comparing the transmission of Er:YAG's light (500mJ, 2Hz, 1W) through 5 types of common restorative materials (feldspatic ceramic, lithium disilicate, monolithic zirconia, zirconium with sintered ceramic and alumina ceramic). 0.5mm and 1mm thickness discs were made with every material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last five years, most in vitro studies have focused mainly on the effect of surface treatment on the wear of the material itself and/or antagonists,[24À35] surface roughness, [24,25,27,34,36À38] fracture resistance, [35,39À45] flexural strength, [23,44,46] chipping resistance, [23] compressive strength, [44] elastic modulus, [44] hardness, [33] laser transmission, [47] LTD [48] and CTE-generated stress fields in monolithic zirconia, [49] translucency and colour (Table 1). [35,46,50À56] Although the results from in vitro studies may not fully reflect the clinical performance of the materials due to the complexity of the clinical environment, they have still contributed to the accumulation of a growing body of useful information on the performance of monolithic zirconia.…”
Section: In Vitro Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sari et al [47] tested the erbium-doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser transmission ratio through different dental ceramics with a thickness of 0.5 and 1 mm.…”
Section: Transmission Of Er-yag Lasermentioning
confidence: 99%